Warrior Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules
A Four Horsemen Enterprises Rules Set
 
  FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups AlbumAlbum   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

6.163 and 6.165 Fit - Author's intent vs Don's reading

 
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules Forum Index -> Egroup Archives
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Doug
Centurion
Centurion


Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 1412

PostPosted: Wed Apr 24, 2002 7:12 pm    Post subject: 6.163 and 6.165 Fit - Author''s intent vs Don''s reading


As a new player, I would appreciate a synopsis of what the varience
is between the author's intended reading and what Don reads into
their words. Otherwise I don't know which way I am seeing it.

OTOH the discord apparently has to do with situations that don't
occur very often, so its probably something that I wouldn't "see" at
my level of game understanding anyway.

--

Doug
The price of freedom is infernal vigilantes

"The tyranny of the legislatures is the most formidable dread at
present, and will be for long years. That of the executive will come
in it's turn, but it will be at a remote period." James Madison, 15
March 1798 (_Papers of J.M._ vol 12, p.14; LC call no. JK.111.M24)

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  
Don Coon
Imperator
Imperator


Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 2742

PostPosted: Fri Apr 26, 2002 11:55 pm    Post subject: Re: 6.163 and 6.165 Fit - Author''s intent vs Don''s reading


> As a new player, I would appreciate a synopsis of what the varience
> is between the author's intended reading and what Don reads into
> their words. Otherwise I don't know which way I am seeing it.
>
> OTOH the discord apparently has to do with situations that don't
> occur very often, so its probably something that I wouldn't "see" at
> my level of game understanding anyway.

The crux of it comes down to when to apply the concept of fit. I am reading
it very rigidly in that you do it after all the concepts of 6.165 are
resolved. Jon (and the general playing population at large)applies fit in
instances where the proxomity of other bodies prevents full pivoting to
conform or lining up (I hope I am getting this right Jon). He and I are
both I think on the same wavelength here, we are just wordsmithing to see if
there are wording loopholes that need to be closed.

As too whether it comes up often or not, I think a lot of that depends on
how your games go. If you tend to stay in nice dressed formations, you will
not enocounter it much. It comes up when the pretty lines start to fall
into disarray (which happens to my army distressingly to often!).

IMHO the hard part about the wording is that almost everyone can look at a
given unit geometry on the board and "know" what the correct resolution
should be. Its saying it with a "black and white applies to all situations"
rule that can be confounding.

Don

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  
Display posts from previous:   
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules Forum Index -> Egroup Archives All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group