Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules

Allow me to paraphrase "Theodoric of York, Medieval Barber:"

Gee, could it be that this particular rules system, whose core mechanics were
devised in 1969 and for a troop scale of 1 figure = only 20 men, has become so
fundamentally inadequate, inaccurate, pedantic, arcane, clumsy and outdated that
years ago it ceased to be a VIABLE, historically accurate yet playable
simulation of ancient/medieval battlefield GENERALship?

Naaaaaaah!

Brian K. Fritz

-----Original Message-----
From: cncbump@... <cncbump@...>
To: WarriorRules@yahoogroups.com <WarriorRules@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Thursday, October 25, 2001 12:11 PM
Subject: Re: [WarriorRules] A little help...


>In a message dated 10/25/2001 11:04:15 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
>jwilkinson62@... writes:
>
><< What if the troops are that run of the mill Irregular
> "C" variety? Why would they be able to hit harder than
> the best of the best? Shouldn't Regular "A"s be given
> the same opportunity to slaughter inferior foes that
> is given to Irregular"A"s? It just seems to stand to
> reason that the best troops in the Warrior system
> shouldn't just have to hang or stick around in a
> battle over inferior trained and morale troops. This
> somehow feels wrong. . .
>
> Kelly
> >>
>Kelly,
>
>This battle has been fought and lost. No one has come up with a really
>viable solution and the rules ho, supported by the list ho have decided this
>aspect to be unbroken. Rule of thumb therfore applies........Not broken, not
>fixed. Many feel this to be an error or lacking in historical flavor, but it
>is what it is. All rules have their idiosyncrasies and we then have the
>option to play with them or not. Se' La Vive.
>
>Chris
>
>
>To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>WarriorRules-unsubscribe@egroups.com
>
>
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]