View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
joncleaves Moderator


Joined: 29 Mar 2006 Posts: 16447
|
Posted: Thu May 06, 2004 2:23 am Post subject: Re: Another question |
 |
|
In a message dated 5/5/2004 22:17:24 Central Daylight Time,
redcoat24@... writes:
What about front rank SA,Sh rear rank 2SA
Both ranks are fighting with SA, can the rear rank fight? Or does the front
rank having Shield disqualify that?>>
SA never fights from a second rank.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
_________________ Roll Up and Win! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
joncleaves Moderator


Joined: 29 Mar 2006 Posts: 16447
|
Posted: Thu May 06, 2004 3:28 am Post subject: Re: Another question |
 |
|
In a message dated 5/5/2004 23:23:47 Central Daylight Time,
larryessick@... writes:
Is this a true statement? IIRC, HTW fights from a second rank and
figures equipped with HTW fight from the second rank even in
subsequent bounds when reduced only to SA.>>
Reverts to 'other weapons and circumstances', actually. the same line SA
always uses.
J
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
_________________ Roll Up and Win! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Legionary

Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 307
|
Posted: Thu May 06, 2004 6:14 am Post subject: Another question |
 |
|
What about front rank SA,Sh rear rank 2SA
Both ranks are fighting with SA, can the rear rank fight? Or does the front rank
having Shield disqualify that?
Allan
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Larry Essick Legionary

Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 461
|
Posted: Thu May 06, 2004 7:22 am Post subject: Re: Another question |
 |
|
> SA never fights from a second rank.
Is this a true statement? IIRC, HTW fights from a second rank and
figures equipped with HTW fight from the second rank even in
subsequent bounds when reduced only to SA.
Did you mean to say 1SA, which is a separate weapon class?
Larry
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Larry Essick Legionary

Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 461
|
Posted: Thu May 06, 2004 3:17 pm Post subject: Re: Another question |
 |
|
> Reverts to 'other weapons and circumstances', actually. the same
line SA
> always uses.
Ah! Thanks Jon.
Larry
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|