 |
Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules A Four Horsemen Enterprises Rules Set
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Mark Stone Moderator


Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 2102 Location: Buckley, WA
|
Posted: Wed Mar 10, 2004 6:44 pm Post subject: Big Boys |
 |
|
Quoting "WarriorRules@yahoogroups.com" <WarriorRules@yahoogroups.com>:
> Not only do I agree that the points and area have a great deal to do with a
> players level/rating, but I also feel the scale is very important. Just
> because a player wins the NICT in 25mm, that does not make him the champ in
> 15mm. I have be told by Scott and many others that 15mm and 25mm are totally
> different game.
I'm sorry that Jon has taken so much flack for this thread. I thought he was
doing a service to beginning players by trying to bring in a real sense of
differing levels of competition.
So here's a "definition" for consideration; it has the advantage of being
empirically verifiable.
Big Boys: A "big boy" is either: (a) someone who, under WRG 7th or under
Warrior, has won the Nationals at Historicon or been part of a winning team at
Cold Wars; (b) someone who, in NASAMW tournament play against a present or past
national or team champion, wins at least 50% of their games.
Probably that totals about 50 or so people who meet that definition. It isn't
hard to see who they are by looking at the last few years of NICT qualifiers,
though there are some top players who never make it to Lancaster. My hunch is --
and I'm just guesing here, of course -- that any of the big boys would be
perfectly comfortable playing anyone who is not in any scale, with any number
of points.
-Mark Stone
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Centurion

Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 1373
|
Posted: Wed Mar 10, 2004 7:18 pm Post subject: Re: Big Boys |
 |
|
--- In WarriorRules@yahoogroups.com, Mark Stone <mark@d...> wrote:
> Quoting "WarriorRules@yahoogroups.com"
<WarriorRules@yahoogroups.com>:
> Probably that totals about 50 or so people who meet that
definition. It isn't
> hard to see who they are by looking at the last few years of NICT
qualifiers,
> though there are some top players who never make it to Lancaster.
My hunch is --
> and I'm just guesing here, of course -- that any of the big boys
would be
> perfectly comfortable playing anyone who is not in any scale, with
any number
> of points.
> -Mark Stone
OK, Mark. By this, I'm a big boy. Every year I've competed (read
wasn't deployed for Uncle) in the last five years I've qualified for
nationals, but I cannot make it to PA due to family constrains on
travel (would have to bring a 1.5 year old).
However, I don't consider myself a "big boy". I am, rather, the guy
the Big Boys don't want to meet in round 2, also known as
a "spoiler". Just as tactically comtepent, but not as consistent.
Wanax
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You cannot download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|