Warrior Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules
A Four Horsemen Enterprises Rules Set
 
  FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups AlbumAlbum   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

break-through ?

 
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules Forum Index -> Egroup Archives
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
joncleaves
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 29 Mar 2006
Posts: 16447

PostPosted: Tue Apr 03, 2001 4:26 am    Post subject: Re: break-through ?


In a message dated 4/2/2001 23:22:59 Central Daylight Time,
eforbes100@... writes:

<< Can a unit break through if they are attacking a units rear? >>
yes.


_________________
Roll Up and Win!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  
Phil Gardocki
Centurion
Centurion


Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 893
Location: Pennsylvania

PostPosted: Tue Apr 03, 2001 7:20 am    Post subject: Re: break-through ?

Sorry Jon, you are in error as outlined in 11.2

Who May (or Must) Break-through
A body inflicting three times as many hand-to-hand casualties than it receives without its opponents breaking can choose to break-through them from front to rear.


<< Can a unit break through if they are attacking a units rear?  >>
yes.



Back to top
View user's profile Send private message [ Hidden ]
Phil Gardocki
Centurion
Centurion


Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 893
Location: Pennsylvania

PostPosted: Tue Apr 03, 2001 7:20 am    Post subject: Re: break-through ?

The rules always said no.  The reasoning is easy to see from the perspective of the figures fighting.  Who would want to get to a position where the enemy could hit him better? Smile
Phil


No option seems to be given for break through back to front.  
Can a unit break through if they are attacking a units rear?





Back to top
View user's profile Send private message [ Hidden ]
Ed Forbes
Centurion
Centurion


Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 1092

PostPosted: Tue Apr 03, 2001 7:23 am    Post subject: break-through ?


I see in the rules that breakthrough is only allowed front to back.
I can, and have, seen a large unit charged both from the front and from
the rear not break.

No option seems to be given for break through back to front.
Can a unit break through if they are attacking a units rear?


Thanks,

Ed F

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  
joncleaves
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 29 Mar 2006
Posts: 16447

PostPosted: Tue Apr 03, 2001 10:27 am    Post subject: Re: break-through ?


In a message dated 4/3/2001 03:21:57 Central Daylight Time, PHGamer@...
writes:

<< The rules always said no. The reasoning is easy to see from the
perspective
of the figures fighting. Who would want to get to a position where the
enemy
could hit him better? Smile >>

Since it is voluntary, choose no.


_________________
Roll Up and Win!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  
joncleaves
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 29 Mar 2006
Posts: 16447

PostPosted: Tue Apr 03, 2001 10:34 am    Post subject: Re: break-through ?


<< Sorry Jon, you are in error as outlined in 11.2

Who May (or Must) Break-through
A body inflicting three times as many hand-to-hand casualties than it
receives without its opponents breaking can choose to break-through them
from
front to rear. >>

Yes, I know what it says in the rules section (numbered greater than 6.0) as
of now. The rules are not done. One of the reasons they are not done is
because I take the time to stop and deal with rules larger than 6.0 when I am
supposed to be getting the first part of the rules finished. :(

I have a stack of notes I am working through about a foot high. On one of
those pages is a reminder to change 11.2 to allow the player to break through
from the rear. The current draft on the egroup is not as up to date as this
stack of fixes. However, if a question is asked of me here I always answer
with what I know the rule WILL BE, regardless of what the egroup draft says.
This gives players a glimpse into the future. I could have said nothing or
regurgitated the rule as written there, but that would not seem to be very
helpful or truthful.
This, from an editing/development standpoint, is a work in progress, and I am
trying to respond with the most up-to-date info possible.

I tried to get away with the very time-saving 'yep' rather than the
explanation above. Oh well....

Besides, I can't be in error. :)

Jon


_________________
Roll Up and Win!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  
Display posts from previous:   
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules Forum Index -> Egroup Archives All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group