Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules

[Greg Regets]

Jon ...

Is there any chance that this rule could get some attention, in the
instance where the two charging units are moving against different
facings of the enemy target unit?

I have actually seen instances where two units couldn't charge
together because of this rule, when the two charging units couldn't
even see each other.

This doesn't come up often, but when you play small points on big
tables in 15mm, you see quite a bit of it.

Thanks ... g



--- In WarriorRules@yahoogroups.com, JonCleaves@a... wrote:
>
> In a message dated 7/4/2004 18:44:43 Central Daylight Time,
> tors1@o... writes:
>
> Following on from this does it follow that if the infantry and
cavalry were
> Ireg A that the infantry still could not have charged?.
>
>
>
> Impetuous infantry that charge with mounted are not cancelled.
>
> Jon
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[joncleaves]

In a message dated 7/6/2004 10:06:43 AM Eastern Daylight Time, "Greg Regets"
<greg.regets@...> writes:

>Jon ...
>
>Is there any chance that this rule could get some attention, in the
>instance where the two charging units are moving against different
>facings of the enemy target unit?>>

We looked at that as part of the initial writing, but I will check all that
stuff as I work on chapter 6 for the new rulebook.