Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules

[John Murphy]

I am thinking abut building a very small, very inexpensive, 25mm
Dacian army to oppose my EIR guys - maybe to use as a recruiting tool.

Heck, I even dream the dream of every Warrior married male - that his
wife will someday miraculously acquire sudden interest in shoving
lead around a table. Sigh... just not going to happen in my case.

Anyone have any thoughts on what kind of Dacian list would be both,
in order, (a) very HC (that's historically-correct, not heavy-
cavalry) and (b) very well-balanced against the EIR list I presented
earlier so one could play either side without getting trounced just
because of list quirks.

I guess it is a bit unfair to say _any_ list based on the IW book
(really, really great job from what I have read so far) would not
be "HC" but the idea is to avoid using the mins and maxes and point
totals to put something on the table that kicks butt but is a bit off
from its _typical_ historical balance.

My wife is learning Fast Warrior - very keen - the dream can become
a reality!

Adrian Williams

--- In WarriorRules@yahoogroups.com, "J. Murphy" <jjmurphy@s...>
wrote:
> I am thinking abut building a very small, very inexpensive, 25mm
> Dacian army to oppose my EIR guys - maybe to use as a recruiting
tool.
>
> Heck, I even dream the dream of every Warrior married male - that
his
> wife will someday miraculously acquire sudden interest in shoving
> lead around a table. Sigh... just not going to happen in my case.
>
> Anyone have any thoughts on what kind of Dacian list would be
both,
> in order, (a) very HC (that's historically-correct, not heavy-
> cavalry) and (b) very well-balanced against the EIR list I
presented
> earlier so one could play either side without getting trounced
just
> because of list quirks.
>
> I guess it is a bit unfair to say _any_ list based on the IW book
> (really, really great job from what I have read so far) would not
> be "HC" but the idea is to avoid using the mins and maxes and
point
> totals to put something on the table that kicks butt but is a bit
off
> from its _typical_ historical balance.