Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules

[Tom McMillan]

In a message dated 4/8/02 8:34:31 AM, WarriorRules@yahoogroups.com writes:

<< First, let me apologize to Tom M if my tone seemed harsh. I tried using
those to point out I was messing with him to some extent in a light
hearted way. Upon reflection, my words might have been misconstrued. >>

No offense taken, and I do appreciate the time taken to reply at length on
such short notice.
Obviously I am aware there will be no such sea change in the rules at this
point.

It is true that such theoretical debate, which I would deem healthy if it
is done constructively, has something of a problem. If it involves you, it
will tie up a great deal of effort better spent elsewhere; if it does not,
you would not be in a position to explain or defend. (And I realise this is
basically what you just said as well.)
I don't know the answer, but I do think that this board is a good place for
such discussion, beyond simple nuts and bolts. It reminds us that , at its
best, Warrior is designed as a simulation, rather than a mathematical
abstraction.

[joncleaves]

Tom

Thanks for your understanding.

I'm just gonna let things like this go on and only step in when we really leave
the tracks of the rules or to answer a rules question.

Jon