Warrior Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules
A Four Horsemen Enterprises Rules Set
 
  FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups AlbumAlbum   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Early Hungarian question

 
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules Forum Index -> Egroup Archives
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Dave Lauerman
Recruit
Recruit


Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 159

PostPosted: Thu Dec 12, 2002 9:24 pm    Post subject: Early Hungarian question


I do have one question for Scott on the Early Hungarians. It looks
like both the Hungarian foot AND the Croatian foot are mandatory if
any foot are used, meaning that if one is used, both must be. This is
clear enough in the list; I only ask because it seems odd that one
must take subject Croats along & cannot use native Hungarian troops
alone. I claim NO expertise on this, and if that was the intent I
have no complaint, but it seemed unusual enough that I ask for
clarification. I seek only to know thy true will, O mighty List Ho,
he of the great soul and puissant pen (etc,etc.)Thanks- dave lauerman

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  
scott holder
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Posts: 6066
Location: Bonnots Mill, MO

PostPosted: Thu Dec 12, 2002 9:24 pm    Post subject: Re: Early Hungarian question


Gotta go home and check. Of course this will mean less time devoted to list w
riting tonight:)SmileSmileSmile Another day's delay in Classical Warrior:)SmileSmile:)

I'll go over it and post something back tomorrow. If it's awfully unclear, I'
ll eventually put it on the errata page.


>>> Dlauerman@... 12/12/02 12:20PM >>>
I do have one question for Scott on the Early Hungarians. It looks
like both the Hungarian foot AND the Croatian foot are mandatory if
any foot are used, meaning that if one is used, both must be. This is
clear enough in the list; I only ask because it seems odd that one
must take subject Croats along & cannot use native Hungarian troops
alone. I claim NO expertise on this, and if that was the intent I
have no complaint, but it seemed unusual enough that I ask for
clarification. I seek only to know thy true will, O mighty List Ho,
he of the great soul and puissant pen (etc,etc.)Thanks- dave lauerman


To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
WarriorRules-unsubscribe@egroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


_________________
These Rules Suck, Let's Paint!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message   Visit poster's website
Dave Lauerman
Recruit
Recruit


Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 159

PostPosted: Thu Dec 12, 2002 10:53 pm    Post subject: Re: Early Hungarian question


--- In WarriorRules@yahoogroups.com, "Holder, Scott <FHWA>"
<Scott.Holder@f...> wrote:
> Gotta go home and check. Of course this will mean less time
devoted to list w
> riting tonight:)SmileSmileSmile Another day's delay in Classical
Warrior:)SmileSmileSmile
Scott- NOOOO!!! AAAAGGHH!!! oh, you were kidding - weren't you ? Ok,
you have located my "hot button",and I am doomed. dave lauerman

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  
scott holder
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Posts: 6066
Location: Bonnots Mill, MO

PostPosted: Fri Dec 13, 2002 4:19 pm    Post subject: Re: Early Hungarian question


Yes, it is clear in the list (double checked that). If you use one infantry,
you hafta use the other. The reason for the "you gotta use both" stems mainly
from the rather close ties that developed after the dynastic union. Thus, wh
enever foot troops were levied (or called up or whatever), they always include
d a loyal Croatian contingent. Moreover, since E Hungarian campaigns that cal
led for infantry (mainly south) would have been in the general neighborhood of
ethnic Croatians part of the E Hungarian kingdom, it also makes sense and see
ms inherently likely that they would have been present. I say this without ha
ving gone back thru the books and source materials used to concoct the E Hunga
rian list, I just did a quick perusal since the clock was ticking and I wanted
to get the Scots Common list done last night.

>>> Dlauerman@... 12/12/02 12:20PM >>>
I do have one question for Scott on the Early Hungarians. It looks
like both the Hungarian foot AND the Croatian foot are mandatory if
any foot are used, meaning that if one is used, both must be. This is
clear enough in the list; I only ask because it seems odd that one
must take subject Croats along & cannot use native Hungarian troops
alone. I claim NO expertise on this, and if that was the intent I
have no complaint, but it seemed unusual enough that I ask for
clarification. I seek only to know thy true will, O mighty List Ho,
he of the great soul and puissant pen (etc,etc.)Thanks- dave lauerman


To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
WarriorRules-unsubscribe@egroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


_________________
These Rules Suck, Let's Paint!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message   Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules Forum Index -> Egroup Archives All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group