Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules

[Rob Turnball]

Anyone have a timeline on this, I see the armies are included in the
historicon theme.
All the best
Robert

[scott holder]

Anyone have a timeline on this, I see the armies are included in the
historicon theme.

>Here's the deal. Feudal Warrior is now in the hands of the various review
staff folks. I'm compiling their input. In the meantime, Bill goes over the
monster line by line. Once I integrate everybody's input, I also go over the
book line by line. I'll also be doing editing since the current product is 79
pages in length.

>Heh heh, you didn't ask for this info. We plan on having Feudal Warrior for
sale at Hcon. However, armies contained in FeudWar that are also found in
"other" lists will still be allowed at Hcon only. Obviously since no one will
have any time to plan accordingly beforehand. Shortly after Hcon, I'll update
the supercession list and it'll be buh-bye to the old lists, at least in
tourneys I run. I'd urge everyone to finally start the weaning process from the
old lists.

>As soon as I'm done with FeudWar, I'll be diving into Imperial Warrior.

Scott

[Kelly Wilkinson]

I knew you would eventually reply to my post concerning Imperial Warrior! Thanks
for the inadvertant Reply!!! I Can't wait to see what you come up with for
the Sassanid Persians!!! I've seen a preliminary list and it looks exciting!!
See you in Oklahoma and have a safe trip!!
Kelly
"Holder, Scott" <Scott.Holder@...> wrote:Anyone have a timeline on
this, I see the armies are included in the
historicon theme.

>Here's the deal. Feudal Warrior is now in the hands of the various review
staff folks. I'm compiling their input. In the meantime, Bill goes over the
monster line by line. Once I integrate everybody's input, I also go over the
book line by line. I'll also be doing editing since the current product is 79
pages in length.

>Heh heh, you didn't ask for this info. We plan on having Feudal Warrior for
sale at Hcon. However, armies contained in FeudWar that are also found in
"other" lists will still be allowed at Hcon only. Obviously since no one will
have any time to plan accordingly beforehand. Shortly after Hcon, I'll update
the supercession list and it'll be buh-bye to the old lists, at least in
tourneys I run. I'd urge everyone to finally start the weaning process from the
old lists.

>As soon as I'm done with FeudWar, I'll be diving into Imperial Warrior.

Scott

Yahoo! Groups SponsorADVERTISEMENT

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
WarriorRules-unsubscribe@egroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Platinum - Watch CBS' NCAA March Madness, live on your desktop!

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Scott Holder wrote
> Um, have you purchased Feudal Warrior? We deliberately crafted the
> later SHK with exactly this in mind and explain it in the notes.

Scott

I do have Feudal Warrior, and hadn't found any comment hence my
statement about "assuming".

I went back and looked again in light of your e-mail, and have found no
comments regarding SHK and shields besides the lines in the army lists
stating they can be removed.

Perhaps you could give me a page reference?

Thanks
Cole

Greetings

Just to add a comment here, all I could find in Feudal Warrior was a
reference on list 27, page 51 Notes lines 13-15. So one could keep Sh
for these figures (for rule and point purposes) and represent these
by unshielded figures in late armour?

The notes refer to German armour but could, possibly, be applied to
armours elsewhere imported from Germany or influenced by its styles?

Regards

Edward

--- In WarriorRules@yahoogroups.com, "Nicholas Cioran" <ncioran@m...>
wrote:
>
> Scott Holder wrote
> > Um, have you purchased Feudal Warrior? We deliberately crafted
the
> > later SHK with exactly this in mind and explain it in the notes.
>
> Scott
>
> I do have Feudal Warrior, and hadn't found any comment hence my
> statement about "assuming".
>
> I went back and looked again in light of your e-mail, and have
found no
> comments regarding SHK and shields besides the lines in the army
lists
> stating they can be removed.
>
> Perhaps you could give me a page reference?
>
> Thanks
> Cole