Warrior Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules
A Four Horsemen Enterprises Rules Set
 
  FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups AlbumAlbum   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

John Murphy's latest example

 
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules Forum Index -> Egroup Archives
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Ewan McNay
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 2778
Location: Albany, NY, US

PostPosted: Mon Apr 19, 2004 3:46 pm    Post subject: John Murphy''s latest example


John, I understand the reduction in desire to keep asking what
seem to be repetitive Qs. I always just assumed that if I didn't
understand, someone else also didn't but was too scared to ask!
So you have at least one vote to keep after any point of
confusion. As Jon noted, there's always 'delete.'

Anyway, on the latest example, Mark noted:

>> The Frankish knights fight HtH.
>> 5@+5 (L v LC) +1 (charge) +2 (impetuous)
>> -2 (support shot CPF) -1 (disordered loose) -1 (tired)
>> 5@+4=12 /8=1 CPF
>>
>> The Byzantine Kavallarioi Archers fight back.
>> 2@+1=3 +12/6=2 CPF
>> Since the Byzantine Kavallarioi Archers took 1 CPF and double
>> HtH they are disordered.
>>
>> The Frankish knights received more casualties (HtH plus
>> support shooting) and 1 CPF so must either break off or
>> recoil.

[Mark S] You never combine HtH and support shooting when
determining casualty RATIOs. You only combine them for
determining total casualties taken, and any consequent
effects based on total casualties. So the knights did not receive
more; they did, as you noted above, in fact put out twice as many
HtH casualties as received.

[Me] This is (I believe) all correct. I would note also that the
knights gave out 12 in hth, and received only 3; so, they did at
least three times as many as they received without breaking their
enemy. This would entitle them to break through the light cav,
and (depending on distance) perhaps convert-charge into the
Byzantine HC lancers who would then receive them at the halt.
This would not be great for the lancers. Now, if the LC have to
break off and have nowhere to go, as Mark suggests, then probably
catching them and hence breaking them is a better bet, but not
necessarily - depending on the lancers' morale, for instance,
they may be likely to pass the waver (at which point they could
then charge through the LC into the Franks). [On the other hand,
a second charge is going to be yet more fatigues on what is
getting to be a pretty tired knight unit. So go the decisions...]

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  
Display posts from previous:   
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules Forum Index -> Egroup Archives All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group