Warrior Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules
A Four Horsemen Enterprises Rules Set
 
  FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups AlbumAlbum   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

knights and HC- Squires as E & D class

 
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules Forum Index -> Egroup Archives
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Doug
Centurion
Centurion


Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 1412

PostPosted: Fri Feb 03, 2006 10:08 pm    Post subject: Re: knights and HC- Squires as E & D class


But are the "retinue" actually good enough at warfare to be class C troops?

Seems to me that most of the knight's servants don't even possess
horses. The squires are properly knights in training, but they would
range in experience from pubescent boys to men days away from getting
their spurs.

If there is justification for allowing the squire to be removed from
his master into a separately deployable element. they should range
from E to D. Add a very few C class elements wherein some Knights
are included to act as the leaders.

The E's would effectively be mounted horse holders following the
knight unit as a detachment.

The rest useful mainly as a morale boost to infantry whom they deploy
behind, but not very combat capable.

>(1) Knights, pages, and squires function overall as a unit to create what we
>call EHK and SHK, and thus both front rank and back rank of units
>should be the
>same;
>(2) Knights occupied the front of the unit, and their lesser-armed mounted
>retinue occupied the back of the unit, and thus the back should be something
>like HK, HC, or MC, depending on time period and nationality.
>-Mark Stone

--
--

Doug
The price of freedom is infernal vigilantes

"Who are the militia? Are they not ourselves? Is it feared, then,
that we shall turn our arms each man against his own bosom? Congress
shall have no power to disarm the militia. Their swords, and every
other terrible implement of the soldier, are the birth-right of an
American ... The unlimited power of the sword is not in the hands of
either the federal or state governments, but where I trust in God it
will ever remain, in the hands of the People."- Tench Coxe, 1788.
http://www.constitution.org/mil/cs_milit.htm

This communication is for use by the intended recipient and contains
information that may be privileged, confidential or copyrighted under
applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby
formally notified that any use, copying or distribution of this e-mail,
in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited. Please notify the sender
by return e-mail and delete this e-mail from your system. Unless
explicitly and conspicuously designated as "E-Contract Intended",
this e-mail does not constitute a contract offer, a contract amendment,
or an acceptance of a contract offer. This e-mail does not constitute
a consent to the use of sender's contact information for direct marketing
purposes or for transfers of data to third parties.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  
Display posts from previous:   
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules Forum Index -> Egroup Archives All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group