Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules

[joncleaves]

<< DBM sucks for a lot of reasons. #1 is that anyone's history PhD dissertation
can change the rules and the lists.

<Yes, lets not let knowledge and education interfere with the games mechanisms.
Lets stay with the "shout loudest and it will come" system >>

Hmmm. Interesting.
Let me translate the first statement. We are not going to fundamentally alter
an established, working and very thoroughly playtested set of game rules due to
the unverified research of a single person.

Let me speak directly to the second statement. The very LAST thing we are going
to do is respond to the loudest shouter in any way.

We gave the Warrior community a year to provide any substantiated recommended
changes. We got a few. We got a great deal of 'I just read Arrian and I think
fill-in-the-blank-pet-issue ought to work this way.' We acted on the former.
A year, by the way, is about 7-11.9 months more than the average playetester
gets to work on a project. I know, I playtest and develop games for three other
companies besides FHE.

That year is over.

Someone wants to get a new rule in the game, it is list rule and x-rule
recommendation time. Not change the rulebook time.

Speech over. Get back to work.

Jon, rule [w]hor(s)e