View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Recruit

Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 6
|
Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2006 8:40 pm Post subject: Re: Off Topic: Rose Bowl |
 |
|
Texas 31
USC 14
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
joncleaves Moderator


Joined: 29 Mar 2006 Posts: 16447
|
Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2006 9:03 pm Post subject: Re: Off Topic: Rose Bowl |
 |
|
In a message dated 1/3/2006 16:27:38 Central Standard Time,
greg.regets@... writes:
Texas 31
USC 27
Sorry, Greg. USC is winning that game.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
_________________ Roll Up and Win! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
joncleaves Moderator


Joined: 29 Mar 2006 Posts: 16447
|
Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2006 9:26 pm Post subject: Re: Re: Off Topic: Rose Bowl |
 |
|
Ok, its my fault - I participated... but please send your Rose predictions
to Greg and let's get them off the group...
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
_________________ Roll Up and Win! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Greg Regets Imperator

Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 2988
|
Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2006 1:23 am Post subject: Off Topic: Rose Bowl |
 |
|
Texas 31
USC 27
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Recruit

Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 47
|
Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2006 1:51 am Post subject: Re: Off Topic: Rose Bowl |
 |
|
Greetings Greg
SC 45
UT 35
--- In WarriorRules@yahoogroups.com, "Greg Regets" <greg.regets@g...> wrote:
>
> Texas 31
> USC 27
>
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bill Chriss Centurion


Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 1000 Location: Texas
|
Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2006 2:20 am Post subject: Re: Off Topic: Rose Bowl |
 |
|
>
> In a message dated 1/3/2006 16:27:38 Central Standard Time,
> greg.regets@... writes:
>
> Texas 31
> USC 27
>
>
>
> Sorry, Greg. USC is winning that game.
>
>
Like V.Y. and Herodotus, I will reserve my comments for after the battle.
-Greek
_________________ -Greek |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Greg Regets Imperator

Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 2988
|
Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2006 2:31 am Post subject: Re: Off Topic: Rose Bowl |
 |
|
I actually expected my post to be deleted ... I was just trying to
convince myself. ;-)
--- In WarriorRules@yahoogroups.com, JonCleaves@a... wrote:
>
> Ok, its my fault - I participated... but please send your Rose
predictions
> to Greg and let's get them off the group...
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Chris Bump Legate

Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 1625
|
Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2006 3:37 am Post subject: Re: Off Topic: Rose Bowl |
 |
|
Emotionally I hope that you are right, but vegas is not seeing things
your way. You could probably get two to 1 against your bet score.
Chris
--- In WarriorRules@yahoogroups.com, "Greg Regets" <greg.regets@g...>
wrote:
>
> Texas 31
> USC 27
>
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Recruit

Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 205
|
Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2006 3:44 am Post subject: Re: Off Topic: Rose Bowl |
 |
|
I will leave Cricket, Rugby and other manly sports out of the list if
your heavily armoured football is also left off the list.
Adrian
--- In WarriorRules@yahoogroups.com, JonCleaves@a... wrote:
>
> Ok, its my fault - I participated... but please send your Rose
predictions
> to Greg and let's get them off the group...
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
joncleaves Moderator


Joined: 29 Mar 2006 Posts: 16447
|
Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2006 3:59 am Post subject: Re: Re: Off Topic: Rose Bowl |
 |
|
Congrats to Texas.
Let's let this thread end on that note, please.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
_________________ Roll Up and Win! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Recruit

Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 45
|
Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2006 8:27 am Post subject: Re: Off Topic: Rose Bowl |
 |
|
Who is going to win??
TEXAS and they have. No apologies for off topic either! ;-)
--- In WarriorRules@yahoogroups.com, JonCleaves@a... wrote:
>
>
> In a message dated 1/3/2006 16:27:38 Central Standard Time,
> greg.regets@g... writes:
>
> Texas 31
> USC 27
>
>
>
> Sorry, Greg. USC is winning that game.
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|