Warrior Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules
A Four Horsemen Enterprises Rules Set
 
  FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups AlbumAlbum   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Roman Legion discussion (allegations)

 
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules Forum Index -> Egroup Archives
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Doug
Centurion
Centurion


Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 1412

PostPosted: Wed May 29, 2002 7:48 pm    Post subject: Roman Legion discussion (allegations)


Thanks, Scott et al.

Warrior is complicated/subtle, and sometimes its hard to see how the
rules should be implemented to play "in a historic way" with a
particular army.

I'd like to see articles for newbies, explaining how the rules best
model the battle styles of popular army pairs. How would you set up
a demo game of Hastings, Agincourt, or Megiddo? Why would you make
units certain sizes? Which units would support others & how would you
set them up on the table to do so?
--

Doug
The price of freedom is infernal vigilantes

"The tyranny of the legislatures is the most formidable dread at
present, and will be for long years. That of the executive will come
in it's turn, but it will be at a remote period." James Madison, 15
March 1798 (_Papers of J.M._ vol 12, p.14; LC call no. JK.111.M24)

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  
scott holder
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Posts: 6066
Location: Bonnots Mill, MO

PostPosted: Thu May 30, 2002 2:35 pm    Post subject: Re: Roman Legion discussion (allegations)


I can't speak for the specific battles in question but, if you contact
Terry Gore, ask him about his old Campaign booklets. He might still
have some left. His one on the Crusades and Saladin are explained and
setup using Warrior mechanics so it should be very easy for anybody to
setup a game.

As for the articles, yeah, all great ideas. But they'd be better
written by people like Ewan or Todd or Eric or Rob, etc.

>>> rockd@... 5/29/02 9:50:00 PM >>>
Thanks, Scott et al.

Warrior is complicated/subtle, and sometimes its hard to see how the
rules should be implemented to play "in a historic way" with a
particular army.

I'd like to see articles for newbies, explaining how the rules best
model the battle styles of popular army pairs. How would you set up
a demo game of Hastings, Agincourt, or Megiddo? Why would you make
units certain sizes? Which units would support others & how would you
set them up on the table to do so?
--

Doug
The price of freedom is infernal vigilantes

"The tyranny of the legislatures is the most formidable dread at
present, and will be for long years. That of the executive will come
in it's turn, but it will be at a remote period." James Madison, 15
March 1798 (_Papers of J.M._ vol 12, p.14; LC call no. JK.111.M24)


To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
WarriorRules-unsubscribe@egroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


_________________
These Rules Suck, Let's Paint!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message   Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules Forum Index -> Egroup Archives All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group