View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
joncleaves Moderator


Joined: 29 Mar 2006 Posts: 16447
|
Posted: Fri May 20, 2005 3:28 am Post subject: Re: RULES EHI charge FP 5.31 |
 |
|
In a message dated 5/19/2005 19:31:35 Central Daylight Time,
jjmurphy@... writes:
"Tactical move or march segment"
Is a charge a tactical move? Where is this defined? >>
6.0, third para. Page 32. So, yes.
<< Which brings up another question if skirmishing
LEHI evade do they take an FP?>>
From the Feudal Japanese list rules:
"3) LEHI counts as loose order for all purposes except it counts as EHI
in shooting and combat and takes no fatigue for being EHI and moving."
So, no.
And since they are loose order for all purposes except those, they certainly
can skirmish if armed with the right weapon.
J
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
_________________ Roll Up and Win! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
John Murphy Legate

Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 1625
|
Posted: Fri May 20, 2005 3:30 am Post subject: RULES EHI charge FP 5.31 |
 |
|
"Tactical move or march segment"
Is a charge a tactical move? Where is this defined? Can this be
clarified please in the future? Perhaps the use of the term "tactical
move" should be struck from the rules altogether and replaced with
exactly what kinds of moves it is - approach, counter, retirement
(maybe charge, evade)? Which brings up another question if skirmishing
LEHI evade do they take an FP?
Thanks
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
joncleaves Moderator


Joined: 29 Mar 2006 Posts: 16447
|
Posted: Fri May 20, 2005 3:33 am Post subject: Re: Re: RULES EHI charge FP 5.31 |
 |
|
In a message dated 5/19/2005 20:17:50 Central Daylight Time,
notalent@... writes:
<<Greetings John,
The List Rule says that LEHI can't skirmish, but if it could it would not
take a FP.>>
This is incorrect, as I have pointed out in another mail. I would ask again
that only FHE folks answer rules questions on here. Thanks!
Jon
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
_________________ Roll Up and Win! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Recruit

Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 194
|
Posted: Fri May 20, 2005 4:13 am Post subject: Re: RULES EHI charge FP 5.31 |
 |
|
--- In WarriorRules@yahoogroups.com, "John" <jjmurphy@s...> wrote:
> "Tactical move or march segment"
> Is a charge a tactical move? Where is this defined? Can this be
> clarified please in the future? Perhaps the use of the term "tactical
> move" should be struck from the rules altogether and replaced with
> exactly what kinds of moves it is - approach, counter, retirement
> (maybe charge, evade)? Which brings up another question if skirmishing
> LEHI evade do they take an FP?
>
> Thanks
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Recruit

Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 194
|
Posted: Fri May 20, 2005 4:15 am Post subject: Re: RULES EHI charge FP 5.31 |
 |
|
Greetings John,
The List Rule says that LEHI can't skirmish, but if it could it would not take
a FP.
Which brings up another question if skirmishing
> LEHI evade do they take an FP?
>
> Thanks
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
John Murphy Legate

Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 1625
|
Posted: Fri May 20, 2005 4:24 am Post subject: Re: RULES EHI charge FP 5.31 |
 |
|
Oh? How do you know an evade (or a charge) isn't a "tactical move"? It
is certainly not a "combat results move" or a "march segment". Is this
defined anywhere?
--- In WarriorRules@yahoogroups.com, "Terry Dix" <notalent@p...> wrote:
> if it could it would not take a FP.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Recruit

Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 194
|
Posted: Fri May 20, 2005 9:45 am Post subject: Re: RULES EHI charge FP 5.31 |
 |
|
Greetings John,
I was refering to the List rule #3 in the Fuedal Japanese list that
says LEHI dont take FP for being EHI and moving.
--- In WarriorRules@yahoogroups.com, "John" <jjmurphy@s...> wrote:
> Oh? How do you know an evade (or a charge) isn't a "tactical move"? It
> is certainly not a "combat results move" or a "march segment". Is this
> defined anywhere?
>
> --- In WarriorRules@yahoogroups.com, "Terry Dix" <notalent@p...> wrote:
> > if it could it would not take a FP.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Recruit

Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 194
|
Posted: Fri May 20, 2005 9:57 am Post subject: Re: RULES EHI charge FP 5.31 |
 |
|
Greetings Jon,
I reread the Rules for skirmish and realized that I took the last part
of the line for Mantlets and assumed it was for ALL situations.
Though I dont know that the list rule allows for skirmish since it was
listed specificaly in the list rule and (L)EHI arent listed in the
main rules as troops that can skirmish ( I dont have all the updates
in my copy so if its been eratraed then Im sorry )
TD
--- In WarriorRules@yahoogroups.com, JonCleaves@a... wrote:
>
> From the Feudal Japanese list rules:
>
> "3) LEHI counts as loose order for all purposes except it counts as EHI
> in shooting and combat and takes no fatigue for being EHI and moving."
>
> So, no.
>
> And since they are loose order for all purposes except those, they
certainly
> can skirmish if armed with the right weapon.
>
> J
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
joncleaves Moderator


Joined: 29 Mar 2006 Posts: 16447
|
Posted: Fri May 20, 2005 10:33 am Post subject: Re: Re: RULES EHI charge FP 5.31 |
 |
|
In a message dated 5/20/2005 02:01:49 Central Daylight Time,
notalent@... writes:
Though I dont know that the list rule allows for skirmish since it was
listed specificaly in the list rule and (L)EHI arent listed in the
main rules as troops that can skirmish >>
The main rules do indeed say that all loose order foot with the right weapon
may employ skirmish formation and the list rule says that LEHI are loose
order foot for all purposes except as weapon factor and not taking fatigue for
EHI movement.
Jon
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
_________________ Roll Up and Win! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|