Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules

[joncleaves]

In a message dated 1/1/2004 09:31:10 Central Standard Time,
jjmurphy@... writes:
I do not understand why such a "donut" or "starfish" would represent a
problem (not that I would use such myself anyway).

Why bother going through the headache of crafting language disallowing
such? They are certainly feasible and possible terrain types and I don't
really get how they are cheesy or gamey or what players could do to use
them in that way.

This is a question, by the way.
I am crafting language to clarify the permissible sizes of terrain features
USING 14.0. I did not say that 'starfish' or 'doughnuts' would be disallowed,
I said any such would have to conform to 14.0 *OR* the players could use some
other manner to determine terrain, which is also totally permissible.

My intent is, that is using 14.0 for terrain, area features have a minimum
and maximum 'footprint' on the table - nothing more.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[John Murphy]

I do not understand why such a "donut" or "starfish" would represent a
problem (not that I would use such myself anyway).

Why bother going through the headache of crafting language disallowing
such? They are certainly feasible and possible terrain types and I don't
really get how they are cheesy or gamey or what players could do to use
them in that way.

This is a question, by the way.