 |
Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules A Four Horsemen Enterprises Rules Set
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Recruit

Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 6
|
Posted: Thu Jun 09, 2005 10:20 pm Post subject: Some rules questions |
 |
|
Hello to all...
I make part of an Italian club of wargames, after years only DBM, I am
successful to carry Warrior on our tables.
By now it is some month that we play it, but some small doubt on the rules is
remained.
On the rule of the Interpenetrazione between Roman legionaries:
1) If the replacement in fighting takes place when the replaced are pushed back,
does the first contact count also for the opponents that follow-up?
2)If the replacement in fighting takes place when the replaced are pushed back,
does the tactical factors for follow-up count?
3)A disordered body can charge?
Thx Fabrizio
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
joncleaves Moderator


Joined: 29 Mar 2006 Posts: 16447
|
Posted: Thu Jun 09, 2005 11:14 pm Post subject: Re: Some rules questions |
 |
|
<< 1) If the replacement in fighting takes place when the replaced are pushed
back,
does the first contact count also for the opponents that follow-up? >>
No. In the files section of this yahoo group you will find our official
clarificatiosn to the rules, which contain:
"6.523 (Pg 55) Add to end: ?When replacing in combat, the charger is considered
at first contact, but the target is not.?
<<2)If the replacement in fighting takes place when the replaced are pushed
back,
does the tactical factors for follow-up count?>>
No, the replacer is - by definition - charging and so the charging modifiers
would apply.
<<3)A disordered body can charge?>>
Yes, as long as it is not in a mandatory rally situation.
Jon
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
_________________ Roll Up and Win! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Greg Preston Recruit

Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 244 Location: Newcastle, Australia
|
Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2005 7:43 am Post subject: Some rules questions |
 |
|
The following items came up in the recent warrior comp down here in Oz.
1. We had a situation where Elephants were fighting disordered LEHI
(front rank) and LMI (second rank). As per Sect 9.41. the target is
"... the type of that immediately behind if worse..."
The question arose is it possible to fight part of an element against
one rank and part against another rank. The Elephants (the animals
themselves) want to keep fighting the LEHI at factor 3 not the LMI at
factor 2- however the crew want to fight the LMI at factor 2 rather
than the LEHI at factor. We were unsure if
(a) the target needed to be an either/or- ie pick a rank which is -on
balance- worse to fight and do it. (the - or worse- applies element by
element)
or
b) the animals and the crew could -in effect- fight against different
ranks. (the -or worse- applies to individual combatants)
the next two questions relate to "Game points"
2. if a unit chooses to adjust its list and take flamming arrows, are
the points for these lost when
a) they are expended ie shot
or
b) only when the unit which bought them is lost/shaken/off table etc
3. Do you / can you loose the points for Fortifications ?
4. Do Lance armed camels fight
a) a rank and a half
or
b) only one rank.
Thanks in advance
Greg P.
Greg Preston
Lecturer in Education
Manager, Web-based Learning and Development
School of Education
Email: edgdp@...
Ph: +61(02) 49215891 Post: School of Education
Fax: +61(02) 49217196 Newcastle University
University Drive
Callaghan 2308 NSW
Australia
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
joncleaves Moderator


Joined: 29 Mar 2006 Posts: 16447
|
Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2005 11:21 pm Post subject: Re: Some rules questions |
 |
|
<<1. We had a situation where Elephants were fighting disordered LEHI
(front rank) and LMI (second rank). As per Sect 9.41. the target is
"... the type of that immediately behind if worse..."
The question arose is it possible to fight part of an element against
one rank and part against another rank. The Elephants (the animals
themselves) want to keep fighting the LEHI at factor 3 not the LMI at
factor 2- however the crew want to fight the LMI at factor 2 rather
than the LEHI at factor. We were unsure if
(a) the target needed to be an either/or- ie pick a rank which is -on
balance- worse to fight and do it. (the - or worse- applies element by
element)
or
b) the animals and the crew could -in effect- fight against different
ranks. (the -or worse- applies to individual combatants)>>
If worse means exactly what it says. If the LEHI factor against crew isn't
worse, then the crew fight what is worse (LMI).
This is better worded in the new rules. The player just gets to choose....makes
it easier.
<<the next two questions relate to "Game points"
2. if a unit chooses to adjust its list and take flamming arrows, are
the points for these lost when
a) they are expended ie shot
or
b) only when the unit which bought them is lost/shaken/off table etc>>
b)
<<3. Do you / can you loose the points for Fortifications ?>>
Lose? You mean as game points? No.
<<4. Do Lance armed camels fight
a) a rank and a half
or
b) only one rank.>>
The rules say b). But I am also going to double check with my list gurus to be
triple sure this is what we want.
Jon
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
_________________ Roll Up and Win! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You cannot download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|