 |
Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules A Four Horsemen Enterprises Rules Set
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
joncleaves Moderator


Joined: 29 Mar 2006 Posts: 16447
|
Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2002 8:30 pm Post subject: Re: Terrain and charging |
 |
|
Patrick
We could not (not didn't want to - COULD not) write a standard rule for hills
as they come in so many shapes and styles.
I plan to put some 'umpires' guidelines (since such a thing is not properly a
rule) out for how to handle such situations and will always take
recommendations.
In our games, and what I will put in the guidlines unless a better idea comes
along, is that if half the base of the element in question is on/in the
terrain representation, that qualifies.
Note that even then, dick players will argue over the millimeter of 'half' no
matter what rules set is used......
Jon
_________________ Roll Up and Win! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Patrick Byrne Centurion

Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 1433
|
Posted: Sat Feb 02, 2002 1:21 am Post subject: Terrain and charging |
 |
|
Is their a pretty standard way that people deal with 3D hills and charging? 3D
hills are often irregular, so you'll find part of the front of the element on
the
hill and part off.
In other words is a standard way when can the defender claim "Halted on higher
ground"?
Also, there was this one time (at band camp), when I charge across (not up) a
hill, but when pivoting to conform I was facing uphill and so hit a "halted
opponent on higher ground". That sucked!
I'm not complaining though because I've seen my own troops charge uphill into
Roman LTS and not only back them down the hill, but broke some and sent them
running, tails between legs, back through Roman artillery advancing to its
rightful spot -on the hill.
-PB
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
joncleaves Moderator


Joined: 29 Mar 2006 Posts: 16447
|
Posted: Sat Feb 02, 2002 2:02 am Post subject: Re: Terrain and charging |
 |
|
Yeah, Brian. and I also know his brother Slow very well....
_________________ Roll Up and Win! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Recruit

Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 55
|
Posted: Sat Feb 02, 2002 6:49 am Post subject: Re: Terrain and charging |
 |
|
Dick players? I think I went to high school with him... he still owes me
money...
-----Original Message-----
From: JonCleaves@... <JonCleaves@...>
To: WarriorRules@yahoogroups.com <WarriorRules@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Friday, February 01, 2002 2:28 PM
Subject: Re: [WarriorRules] Terrain and charging
>Patrick
>
>We could not (not didn't want to - COULD not) write a standard rule for hills
>as they come in so many shapes and styles.
>
>I plan to put some 'umpires' guidelines (since such a thing is not properly a
>rule) out for how to handle such situations and will always take
>recommendations.
>In our games, and what I will put in the guidlines unless a better idea comes
>along, is that if half the base of the element in question is on/in the
>terrain representation, that qualifies.
>
>Note that even then, dick players will argue over the millimeter of 'half' no
>matter what rules set is used......
>
>Jon
>
>
>To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>WarriorRules-unsubscribe@egroups.com
>
>
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You cannot download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|