Warrior Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules
A Four Horsemen Enterprises Rules Set
 
  FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups AlbumAlbum   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Terry's Post

 
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules Forum Index -> Egroup Archives
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message

Recruit
Recruit


Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 66

PostPosted: Thu Jun 13, 2002 6:53 pm    Post subject: Terry''s Post


Hi all,

As another newcomer to the rules, I have been following the
conformity/pivoting discussion with great interest (though it took me
a while to understand the whole "v" formation complaint, and I'm
still not sure I understand that).

In light of all the other conversation, I thought that Terry's posted
suggestion was a model of clarity.

His final point, regarding advantage of position when there is a tie,
is one of game philosophy. While he favors the attacker (presumably
forcing a defender to conform out of protective terrain, etc.) I
would think that historically, an attacker who failed to carry a
position should not receive an additional advantage which it did not
earn in combat.

On an unrelated matter, in the FW army list, Wars of the Roses
English (223), it gives billmen "2HCT, Pa". Does this mean Pavise?
(and I won't be a critic and ask where this comes from... ;-)

Also, the notation that the longbowmen get a +1 in HTH as sword and
buckler men - is this an extra list-specific "plus" not found in the
rules or chart?

On a final note, and I apologize if it is in the rules - I have been
looking and not found it - can you have mixed morale troops, ie,
English Reg C HI Billmen with a front rank of dismounted knight Reg B
EHI Billmen in the same unit? If so, how do they test morale, etc.?

Thanks,
Dave Lynch

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  
joncleaves
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 29 Mar 2006
Posts: 16447

PostPosted: Thu Jun 13, 2002 6:59 pm    Post subject: Re: Terry''s Post


I have read Terry's posts and have included them in the pile of stuff I will
review in working on a nice tight, SHORT clarification to 6.163/5.

Pa is the Warrior abbreviation for Pavise.

You can have (as long as the list allows) mixed morale troops (detachments and
generals joining units also cause this sometimes).

You get the morale benefit of having the higher morale troops, if one is
applicable, but you test waver on the lowest morale in the unit.

Jon


_________________
Roll Up and Win!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  

Recruit
Recruit


Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 52

PostPosted: Thu Jun 13, 2002 7:10 pm    Post subject: Re: Terry''s Post


--- In WarriorRules@y..., JonCleaves@a... wrote:
> I have read Terry's posts and have included them in the pile of
stuff I will review in working on a nice tight, SHORT clarification to
6.163/5.




Short is good, providing its clear. Best wishes,

Terry

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  
Display posts from previous:   
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules Forum Index -> Egroup Archives All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group