Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules

[Chris Damour]

<AOL mode>"We're interested."</AOL mode>

--
Christopher Damour

On Thu, 29 Jul 2004, Ewan McNay wrote:

> Everyone, all together now: "we're interested" )
>
> JonCleaves@... wrote:
>
> > In a message dated 7/29/2004 12:09:25 PM Eastern Daylight Time, "Charles
Yaw" <yaw@...> writes:
> >
> >
> >>Ewan wrote: ...is anyone else going to write one of
> >>these? >.
> >
> >
> > I would if people were interested.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

[John Garlic]

I'd love to write an NICT AAR, but have to go first '05!!!!!

John Garlic

> Ewan wrote: ...is anyone else going to write one of
> these?
>
> While I am not, I have found the ones you wrote to be interesting and
> helpful, so thanks for the effort. I look forward to seeing all the NICT
> lists and a reveiw of them.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

As a newcomer, I couldn't agree more.

Peter

<jwilkinson62@y...> wrote:
> I certainly would be, jon. And I think that it would be invaluable
for people who are new to Warrior to hear comments based on your
playing style.
>
>
kelly
>

Are the actual lists used in this years competition going to be published?

Kingo


----- Original Message -----
From: "Ewan McNay" <ewan.mcnay@...>
To: <WarriorRules@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, July 30, 2004 5:08 AM
Subject: Re: Very long NICT AAR - Was: Re: [WarriorRules] Historicon results


>
>
> Todd Schneider wrote:
>
> > Personally, I am more interested in List
> > "de-construction" as it were, and trying to figure out
> > from a "newer Player" point of view why a certain list
> > would be taken a certain way. The one thing holding
> > me back in that regards is that being a newer player,
> > I only have access to the FHE lists and a couple of
> > the Hutchby and Clark books.
>
> Well, H&C are generally pretty unbalanced. FHE lists are (imnsho)
> tremendous. Just a huge leap ahead of anything else available. I
> think they are - or should bee - a massive selling point for new folk.
> OK, I'll calm down now .
>
> > I liked you review of the 2003 NICT lists, because it
> > gave me a different point of view to look at other
> > players lists and methods.
>
> Well, when Scott has the time to post the 2004 lists, I'll do the
> same. Opinions I got .
>
> My own list - well, for whatever reason I was inspired by the
> Sassanids, which was the key motivator behind actually buying the
> army. But then - as you note - comes the choice of how to take it.
>
> I guess I'll cover this in the big review. Basically, I wanted not to
> have anything that was an inviting target for the enemy (which I
> expected to be knight or close foot, primarily; I did not design the
> list to cope with massed elephants and it showed). I wanted to have
> as much regularity of support troops as I could (the LC being regular
> was a big factor in my picking the army; ditto the availability of
> decent reg LI). I wanted to be able to hit hard on a small frontage
> (hence SHC and El) and be something different from most contenders
> (because that would put me out of the mainstream of what most folk
> might design their armies against) - hence the bow-armed,
> elephant-proof, shielded SHC.
>
> As it all turned out, my support troops did much of the work while the
> noble SHC lounged around in several of the battles. But that's fine.
>
> Anyway, thanks for the comments/requests. I'll try to hit them.
>
> e
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>

[Todd Schneider]

Yes,

Scott usuallu posts them a couple of weeks after the
tournament.

Todd

--- Alex King <tors1@...> wrote:

---------------------------------
Are the actual lists used in this years competition
going to be published?

Kingo


----- Original Message -----
From: "Ewan McNay" <ewan.mcnay@...>
To: <WarriorRules@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, July 30, 2004 5:08 AM
Subject: Re: Very long NICT AAR - Was: Re:
[WarriorRules] Historicon results


>
>
> Todd Schneider wrote:
>
> > Personally, I am more interested in List
> > "de-construction" as it were, and trying to figure
out
> > from a "newer Player" point of view why a certain
list
> > would be taken a certain way. The one thing
holding
> > me back in that regards is that being a newer
player,
> > I only have access to the FHE lists and a couple
of
> > the Hutchby and Clark books.
>
> Well, H&C are generally pretty unbalanced. FHE
lists are (imnsho)
> tremendous. Just a huge leap ahead of anything else
available. I
> think they are - or should bee - a massive selling
point for new folk.
> OK, I'll calm down now .
>
> > I liked you review of the 2003 NICT lists, because
it
> > gave me a different point of view to look at other
> > players lists and methods.
>
> Well, when Scott has the time to post the 2004
lists, I'll do the
> same. Opinions I got .
>
> My own list - well, for whatever reason I was
inspired by the
> Sassanids, which was the key motivator behind
actually buying the
> army. But then - as you note - comes the choice of
how to take it.
>
> I guess I'll cover this in the big review.
Basically, I wanted not to
> have anything that was an inviting target for the
enemy (which I
> expected to be knight or close foot, primarily; I
did not design the
> list to cope with massed elephants and it showed).
I wanted to have
> as much regularity of support troops as I could (the
LC being regular
> was a big factor in my picking the army; ditto the
availability of
> decent reg LI). I wanted to be able to hit hard on
a small frontage
> (hence SHC and El) and be something different from
most contenders
> (because that would put me out of the mainstream of
what most folk
> might design their armies against) - hence the
bow-armed,
> elephant-proof, shielded SHC.
>
> As it all turned out, my support troops did much of
the work while the
> noble SHC lounged around in several of the battles.
But that's fine.
>
> Anyway, thanks for the comments/requests. I'll try
to hit them.
>
> e
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>


Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ADVERTISEMENT


---------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/WarriorRules/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
WarriorRules-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
Terms of Service.