Warrior Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules
A Four Horsemen Enterprises Rules Set
 
  FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups AlbumAlbum   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Warrior Cold Wars Results
Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules Forum Index -> Egroup Archives
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
joncleaves
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 29 Mar 2006
Posts: 16447

PostPosted: Fri Mar 19, 2004 10:53 pm    Post subject: Re: Re: Warrior Cold Wars Results


In a message dated 3/19/2004 2:47:40 PM Eastern Standard Time,
hrisikos@... writes:

> Is ths the new vogue? Have we started
> something here? If this trend continues, we might actually have a
> 15mm Open final that replicates the Peloponnesian War!! I
> can hardly
> contain myself.>>


Ah....all those Classical Warrior customers...... :)


_________________
Roll Up and Win!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  
scott holder
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Posts: 6070
Location: Bonnots Mill, MO

PostPosted: Fri Mar 19, 2004 11:14 pm    Post subject: RE: Re: Warrior Cold Wars Results


Hoplites...try them, you'll like them.

>But there's a perfectly good reason they went out of style: phalangites:)SmileSmile
Well, okay, constant internal fighting weakened any pan-hellenic resistance to
the Macedonian threat to the north, the Roman weapons system was being devised
in parallel but completely independently of Greece to deal with Greece-like
armies so they woulda been killed in the long haul, etc etc:)Smile:)

>Warrior's great at showing how weapons systems grew obsolete over time. The
chariot is a case in point. At least that perception of Warrior was pointed out
to me at Cold Wars and I must admit, there's some credence to it.

>Having said all of that, this thread just reinforces why I love theme
tournaments.

Scott "One Eye in Training" Holder


_________________
These Rules Suck, Let's Paint!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message   Visit poster's website
Derek Downs
Recruit
Recruit


Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 163

PostPosted: Thu Apr 21, 2005 4:32 pm    Post subject: Re: Re: Warrior Cold Wars Results


So, looking for guidance in terms of what to expect in the NICT at Historicon,
these results really don't tell me anything. And that's a good thing.


-Mark Stone
"Expect the unexpected." Derekcus 2005


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  
scott holder
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Posts: 6070
Location: Bonnots Mill, MO

PostPosted: Thu Apr 21, 2005 6:22 pm    Post subject: Warrior Cold Wars Results


Sportsman: Charles Randow
Best Camp: Mike Mallamaci
Other folks nominated for Sportsman: Matt Kollmer, Steve Hollowell, Alex Stone.

15mm Mini Open

1) Craig Scott, Sassanid Persian, 29.5
2) Mike Kelly, Mongol, 21
3) Dave Dietrich, Mithradatic, 20.1
4) Charles Yaw, Sassanid Persian, 18.7
5) Kelly Wilkinson, Hohenstaufen Sicilian, 18
6) Tom Barkus, Mithradatic, 16.3
7) Dave Beatty, Mithradatic, 11.3
Cool Steve Hollowell, Nikephorian Byzantine, 10.1
9) Mark Hissam, Medieval Spanish, 10
10) Bill Low, Later Carthaginian, 8.9
11) Jon Becker, Medieval Spanish, 8.8
12) Dan Woyke, Neo-Assyrian Empire, 8.7

25mm Mini Open

1) Mike Mallamaci, Nikephorian Byzantine, 27.9
2) Jamie Gentry, Scots Common, 22.9
3) Rob Turnball, Han Dynasty, 18
4) Scott McDonald, Mongol, 12.7
5) Dick Hurchanik, Later Ottoman Turkish, 12.4
6) Rich Kroupa, Medieval German Princes, 9.6
7) Eric Turner, Sassanid Persian, 9
Cool Michael Bard, Syracusan, 7.1
9) Phil Gardocki, Anglo-Irish, 7
10) Allan Lougheed, Han Dynasty, 5.6

15mm Doubles

1) Dave Beatty & Dave Dietrich, Mithradatic, 26
2) Mark Hissam & John Murphy, Medieval Spanish, 25.6
3) Tim Grimmett & Don Carter, Gallic, 22.1
4) Eric Turner & Scott Holder, Early Visigoths, 20
5) Bill Low & Mike Mallamaci, Later Tang Dynasty, 19.7
6) Charles Yaw & Jon Becker, Italian Condotta, 15.7
7) Steve Hollowell & Kelly Wilkinson, Medieval Spanish, 10
Cool Charles Randow & Robert Hoffrichter, Russ, 4.2

25mm Doubles

1) Frank Gilson & Dave Stier, Hundred Years War English, 43.4
2) Dave Markowitz & Ewan McNay, Sassanid Persian, 39.9
3) Tim Brown & Ambrose Coddington, Arab Conquest, 34.8
4) Jon Cleaves & Mike Turner, Han Dynasty, 33
5) Rob Turnball & Dick Hurchanik, Seleucid, 26.6
6) Rich Kroupa & Rich Kroupa's son, Berber, 19.2
7) Greg Hauser & Chris Schulitz, Sultanate of Delhi, 18.9
Cool Dan Woyke & Matt Kollmer, Moldavian, 18.5
9) Mike Kelly & Mike Byrne, Nikephorian Byzantine, 17.8
10) Marc Cribbs & Jim Bisigani, Later Achaemenid Persian, 14.4
11) Mark Stone & Alex Stone, Shang Dynasty, 14.1
12) Jamie Gentry & Bill Chamis, Scots Common, 13.6
13) Michael Bard & Allan Lougheed, Han Dynasty, 11.8
Craig Scott & Bob Leibl, Sassanid Persian, 11.8


_________________
These Rules Suck, Let's Paint!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message   Visit poster's website
Mark Stone
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 2102
Location: Buckley, WA

PostPosted: Thu Apr 21, 2005 6:34 pm    Post subject: Re: Warrior Cold Wars Results


One thing that I like a lot about these results:

There doesn't seem to be any real pattern to the armies people chose to take.

Lots of Sassanid Persian; that seems to be the current "top choice". But lots is
still a miniority by a long shot (even if *grumble* Alex and I did have to face
2 of them in 3 games). Some knight armies, but even there quite a mix. Some
pike armies. Not as many elephant armies as I anticipated (says he, who brought
370+ bows). I don't classify Sassanids as an elephant army, really; to me an
elephant army means six or more elephants. No Burmese, no Khmer; that's quite a
surprise. Quite a few armies from Oriental Warrior (Mongol, Tang, Shang, Han).
But I think it's fair to say that this was an area that was previously
under-represented.

So, looking for guidance in terms of what to expect in the NICT at Historicon,
these results really don't tell me anything. And that's a good thing.


-Mark Stone

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message   MSN Messenger
Derek Downs
Recruit
Recruit


Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 163

PostPosted: Thu Apr 21, 2005 8:30 pm    Post subject: Re: Re: Warrior Cold Wars Results


In a message dated 4/21/2005 5:04:04 PM Eastern Standard Time,
mark@... writes:
Indeed. I can confidently say that the army I'm bringing has never been played
at either Cold Wars or Historicon. Should be interesting; the figures are
ready, now I just need more practice.


-Mark
What army is that? Please email the troop list and your desired tactics to
everyone on this forum.

Derek


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  
Mark Stone
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 2102
Location: Buckley, WA

PostPosted: Thu Apr 21, 2005 11:55 pm    Post subject: Re: Warrior Cold Wars Results


--- On April 21 I said: ---
>>
>> So, looking for guidance in terms of what to expect in the NICT at
Historicon,
>> these results really don't tell me anything. And that's a good thing.
>>
--- To which Derek replied: ---
>
> "Expect the unexpected." Derekcus 2005
>

Indeed. I can confidently say that the army I'm bringing has never been played
at either Cold Wars or Historicon. Should be interesting; the figures are
ready, now I just need more practice.


-Mark

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message   MSN Messenger
Mark Stone
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 2102
Location: Buckley, WA

PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2005 12:39 am    Post subject: Re: Warrior Cold Wars Results


--- On April 21 Derek Downs said: ---
>
> -Mark
> What army is that? Please email the troop list and your desired tactics to
> everyone on this forum.
>

Gosh, Derek, I just don't seem to have a copy of the troop list handy; so sorry
about that. The "desired" tactics are pretty straightforward though:
- Roll up on shooting
- Roll up in hand to hand
- Pass all waver tests
- Hope my opponent deploys with his troops facing away from me

;-)

See you in July,
Mark

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message   MSN Messenger

Recruit
Recruit


Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 194

PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2005 2:11 am    Post subject: Re: Warrior Cold Wars Results


Greetings Mark,
If you need some practice bring it to KublaCon I have armies in both scales(
though I need to paint some cav in 25s) I don't think I will be going to
Historicon, unless we get a qualifier and its me Very Happy
> Gosh, Derek, I just don't seem to have a copy of the troop list handy; so
sorry
> about that. The "desired" tactics are pretty straightforward though:
> - Roll up on shooting
> - Roll up in hand to hand
> - Pass all waver tests
> - Hope my opponent deploys with his troops facing away from me
>
> Wink
>
> See you in July,
> Mark

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  
Display posts from previous:   
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules Forum Index -> Egroup Archives All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group