View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Dave_H Recruit

Joined: 05 Aug 2007 Posts: 6
|
Posted: Sun Aug 05, 2007 6:21 am Post subject: Byzantines (HW #32) |
 |
|
I had a question about the errata for this list. On the website it states to add two new lines identical to eachother, one in the main list and another under the "If CinC is Nicaean or Palaeologan." The new line reads "Extra to upgrade Irr C Bowmen or Archers to Reg D @ 6 pts if LMI, @ 0 pts if LI...0-1/2" in both cases. Assuming this is a typo and only to belong in one of the two locations, which is correct?
Thanks ahead of time,
Dave Huber |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Dave_H Recruit

Joined: 05 Aug 2007 Posts: 6
|
Posted: Sun Aug 05, 2007 4:16 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
One other thing I noticed. In HW #33 on page 69 Line 1, Morean Koursatores do not have a point value associated with them. I believe it would be 12, though I just wanted to make sure. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
scott holder Moderator


Joined: 30 Mar 2006 Posts: 6066 Location: Bonnots Mill, MO
|
Posted: Thu Sep 06, 2007 3:14 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
Sorry Dave to have taken so long to reply.
Haven't looked at this per se but it's now in my "pending file". I'll either have errata up (if warranted) or provide an answer here.
scott _________________ These Rules Suck, Let's Paint! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|