View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
srawls Recruit

Joined: 18 Apr 2006 Posts: 86
|
Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2007 2:29 pm Post subject: Chariot charges |
 |
|
Here in Jacksonville we have always played that a Regular Chariot with a General and a regular foot detachment can make an impetuous charge. The chariot charges impetuously and the detachment charges non-impetuously, both taking the requisite fatigues for the impetuous charge .
It has been pointed out in this forum that such a unit cannot make an impetuous charge. I re-read the relevant sections in the rule book (detachments, impetuous charges, and the section on Chariots) and I don't see anything that would prevent such a combined unit from making an impetuous charge in the manner described.
Are we doing this wrong? If so, which section of the rule book prevents this?
Tks,
Steve |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mark Stone Moderator


Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 2102 Location: Buckley, WA
|
Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2007 3:52 pm Post subject: Re: Chariot charges |
 |
|
srawls wrote: |
Here in Jacksonville we have always played that a Regular Chariot with a General and a regular foot detachment can make an impetuous charge. The chariot charges impetuously and the detachment charges non-impetuously, both taking the requisite fatigues for the impetuous charge .
It has been pointed out in this forum that such a unit cannot make an impetuous charge. I re-read the relevant sections in the rule book (detachments, impetuous charges, and the section on Chariots) and I don't see anything that would prevent such a combined unit from making an impetuous charge in the manner described.
Are we doing this wrong? If so, which section of the rule book prevents this?
Tks,
Steve |
Jon and I had an exchange about this a couple of years ago that's probably buried somewhere in the archives, and I'm sure he'll weigh in, but here's what I remember:
* Charges are declared by bodies;
* Regular foot are part of the body;
* Regular foot cannot declare impetous charges;
* Therefore the body cannot declare an impetuous charge.
This gets a little unclear because apparently parallel situations do not operate in a parallel manner. Compare, for example:
* Charges are declared by bodies;
* An LI detachment attached behind an elephant is part of the elephant body;
* LI cannot declare frontal charges on steady loose or close formation troops;
* Therefore the elephant body cannot declare frontal charges on steady loose or close formation troops.
Clearly we allow the latter, so the reasoning is somehow flawed. But I'm pretty sure the reasoning in the former is correct. I suspect it has to do with the fact that under some circumstances LI could charge loose or close formation troops, whereas under no circumstances can regular foot charge impetuously.
Anyway, I agree that some clarification from Jon would help.
-Mark Stone |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
joncleaves Moderator


Joined: 29 Mar 2006 Posts: 16447
|
Posted: Thu Oct 18, 2007 4:48 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
For the question, can reg foot declare an impetuous charge even in a mixed body of chariots - no. See 6.167:
"The following troops are incapable of declaring an
impetuous charge:
• Elephants
• “E” class
• Regulars on foot
• Any troops tired or uneasy at declaration"
Remember that the word troops is short for "body of troops"
As for the LI Mark speaks of - 6.161, first para after the bullets:
"If they are in a mixed body with
other mounted, they may charge any target." _________________ Roll Up and Win! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mark Stone Moderator


Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 2102 Location: Buckley, WA
|
Posted: Thu Oct 18, 2007 4:53 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
joncleaves wrote: |
For the question, can reg foot declare an impetuous charge even in a mixed body of chariots - no. See 6.167:
"The following troops are incapable of declaring an
impetuous charge:
• Elephants
• “E” class
• Regulars on foot
• Any troops tired or uneasy at declaration"
Remember that the word troops is short for "body of troops"
As for the LI Mark speaks of - 6.161, first para after the bullets:
"If they are in a mixed body with
other mounted, they may charge any target." |
Thanks Jon! I knew we had re-hashed all this before; the LI rule is the one I had forgotten.
-Mark Stone |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
srawls Recruit

Joined: 18 Apr 2006 Posts: 86
|
Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2007 1:43 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
Tks John.
Steve |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
joncleaves Moderator


Joined: 29 Mar 2006 Posts: 16447
|
Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2007 1:48 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
You fine gents are most welcome. _________________ Roll Up and Win! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Todd Schneider Centurion

Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 904 Location: Kansas City
|
Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2007 7:55 am Post subject: |
 |
|
Quote: |
Any troops tired or uneasy at declaration |
Thats one I know I have missed in my games...
Todd _________________ Finding new and interesting ways to snatch defeat from the jaws of Victory almost every game! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
John Garlic Legionary


Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 450 Location: Weslaco, TX
|
Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2007 11:51 am Post subject: |
 |
|
Jon,
These questions occurred last night between Dmitri's Samurai and my Han. I believe they apply to this strand. They involved a Han unit (2E HCh with a detachment of chaiot runners as rear rank) facing 4E samurai.
Question 1 - The Han unit took 2 CPF from prep fire. Does it charge unprompted, or halt until end of next bound?
Question 2 - We 'assumed' must halt and I took and passed a waver to charge. Charge began at 120p. Samurai also charged impetuously while HCh/LMI charged non-impetuously. Is HCh/LMI charge canceled due to impetuous charge since had regular infantry in second rank?
Thanks,
John and Dmitri |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
joncleaves Moderator


Joined: 29 Mar 2006 Posts: 16447
|
Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2007 4:07 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
Question 1: In such a situation use the shooting reaction of the element(s) that were shot.
Question 2 is answered by the errata:
6.163K (page 44): Add to end of paragraph after the bullets: In the case of mixed units and canceled charges, what matters is what troop type is in the front rank of each unit in question. _________________ Roll Up and Win! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Frank Gilson Moderator

Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 1567 Location: Orange County California
|
Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2007 5:41 pm Post subject: further clarification, mixed bodies/charges |
 |
|
Also, notes the clarification to 6.163K (page 44):
"In the case of mixed units and canceled charges, what matters is what troop type is in the front rank of each unit in question"
Therefore, the above described Chariot unit with detachment of regular foot DOES NOT have its charge cancelled if its target is also charged by a separate mounted or impetuous body (as long as the reg foot are NOT in the front rank.)
Just keep that in mind also...
Frank |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|