View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
scott holder Moderator


Joined: 30 Mar 2006 Posts: 6066 Location: Bonnots Mill, MO
|
Posted: Fri May 06, 2011 7:53 pm Post subject: Feudal Warrior Errata to May 2011 |
 |
|
Go here:
http://www.fourhorsemenenterprises.com/FeudalWarriorErrata.pdf
and see what havoc we have wrought!
scott _________________ These Rules Suck, Let's Paint!
Last edited by scott holder on Tue Sep 10, 2013 2:40 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ed Kollmer Centurion

Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 1018
|
Posted: Sat May 07, 2011 1:31 am Post subject: |
 |
|
Thanks Scott.
Once more you have saved humanity as we know it.
EdK |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Matt Kollmer Recruit

Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 87
|
Posted: Sun May 08, 2011 1:49 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
Maybe now my Med Irish won't suck so bad??!!  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Historian Recruit


Joined: 27 Feb 2011 Posts: 239 Location: Pennsylvannia
|
Posted: Mon May 09, 2011 3:50 pm Post subject: Galloglaich updates |
 |
|
Well, this simplifies my decision tree. Under the last set of rules regarding Barbarian Infantry, my Galloglaich were considered Barbarian Infantry, but I was using a detachment of Kens for the third rank, which we just figured out was invalid.
I was cringing at the cost of upgrading the 3rd rank to close order Irreg ‘B’ foot.
Now the Galloglaich have their own bullitt points, and have most of the Barbarian Infantry advantages, without the required 3rd rank or size. Trade off being no fighting from the 3rd rank as well. But since they can do 40 casualties on even die rolls against foot, losing 4 casualties for that lonely man in the third rank is no big loss. _________________ Phil
Japanese telephones work pretty much like ours, except the person on the other end can't understand you. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|