| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
sleepysloo
Recruit
Joined: 31 Dec 2014
Posts: 62
Location: Millom, England
|
 Posted: Sun Feb 07, 2021 5:51 pm Post subject: Replacing Romans Disordered? |
 |
|
Are Romans using the Roman Infantry replacing rule disordered by any previous bound's combat results movement by the replaced unit?
i.e. does a recoil or follow up by the replaced unit during the previous bound render the replaced unit a 'moving body' thereby disordering the replacements when they charge through them as per 2nd Bullet Point 6.521?
Many thanks! 🙂 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Frank Gilson
Moderator
Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 1567
Location: Orange County California
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 07, 2021 11:14 pm Post subject: Re: Replacing Romans Disordered? |
|
|
| sleepysloo wrote: |
Are Romans using the Roman Infantry replacing rule disordered by any previous bound's combat results movement by the replaced unit?
i.e. does a recoil or follow up by the replaced unit during the previous bound render the replaced unit a 'moving body' thereby disordering the replacements when they charge through them as per 2nd Bullet Point 6.521?
Many thanks! 🙂 |
No...the replaced as you name them here are not moving at the time they are replaced (during charges on that following turn). Thus no disorder in this case.
The main occasion when the interpenetration of moving causes disorder is during charges...which note, are effectively simultaneous with charge responses...
Thus, if you had a LI unit evade back through a unit of yours...that was charging something, that charger would be disordered. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Album
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
![[ Hidden ]](templates/subBlack/images/lang_english/icon_email.gif "[ Hidden ]"){kind=icon}