Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules

[Doug]

>One would think that the first bullet of RUSH orders (4.51 p22) would
>force you to do this, as you must declare charges on all legal
>targets ... unles of course you could declare these charges, without
>actually executing them. ha-ha!>.
>[
>I know you are kidding around, Greg, but just to be clear - nothing about
>RUSH orders makes you echelon against a second target and no, you
>can't declare
>a charge and then voluntarily not do it.
> J

Here's a new question for clarity.

During the Charge Declaration phase, are we "declaring" against
individual units of our choice, or is the "declaration" against a set
of units which we have no control over; the set being comprised of
certain units which are within an area bounded by the Charge Reach
and Charge Path rules?

[joncleaves]

In a message dated 9/1/2004 01:03:33 Central Daylight Time,
rockd@... writes:

During the Charge Declaration phase, are we "declaring" against
individual units of our choice, or is the "declaration" against a set
of units which we have no control over; the set being comprised of
certain units which are within an area bounded by the Charge Reach
and Charge Path rules?



The latter.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[joncleaves]

The rules here do need to reflect this as it is not at all clear as it is
currently written. The rule currently talks of declaring on a "target", and is
not at all clear that the charge is declared on an entire area and all legel
targets within that area.>>

The rules state: "Charges count as declared on all legal targets in or moving
into the 'charge path',"

And that is how I intend the rules to continue to read.

I'm not trying to be difficult, but I don't see the need to change that sentence
in any way.

Jon