Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules

[scott holder]

1. Should the line that reads "Extra to give Dacian Warriors 2HCW @3 points" in
fact read "Extra to give Dacian Warriors 2HCW @2 points if general's element,
@3 points if Warriors"?

>This will be up the next time I do erata. BTW, I posted erata for Classical,
Feudal, Oriental, about 2 weeks ago. Didn't say anything since I wanted time
for everybody's web provider's cacheing system to catch up. Everytime I post
"erata is now up" the day I make the changes, I get endless complaints about how
you can't see the changes. Hope this works better. Again, the above Dacian
suggestion is not yet in the erata. Will be next time.

scott

[Bill Low]

Scott answered the first of Mark's two questions; the second is in my
court.

The exception in the last sentence of the List Notes is intended to
allow the player to take any number of elements of Bastarnae up to
the stated "minimum" (i.e., up to 2E MC and/or 6E LMI/LI) without
taking the Ally-general, and thus the answer to the question is a
combo of possibilities 2(a) and 2(b). If the player chooses to take
the Bastarnae Ally-General, or takes more than the minimum in either
category of Bastarnae, then the usual min/max rules for "*" troops
apply.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 15:44:39 +0000
From: Mark Stone <mark@...>
Subject: Dacian army list questions

I have a couple of questions regarding the Dacian list (Imperial
Warrior #15):
….
2. The list notes -- last sentence -- say that "Minimums marked *
apply only if troops so marked of that nationality are used except
that Bastarnae minimums can be used without an Ally-general."

So, I don't understand what that means. I can think of three
possibilities:
(a) I can use the Bastarnae with less than the minimums, and not take
an ally general.
(b) I can use exactly the Bastarnae minimums, and not take an ally
general.
(c) If I take the Bastarnae at all, I have to take at least the
minimums, except that the ally general, who is marked as a minimum,
isn't really a minimum.

Of these, (c) doesn't really make any sense, (a) doesn't make a lot
more sense, and (b) just seems odd.

-Mark Stone