Warrior Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules
A Four Horsemen Enterprises Rules Set
 
  FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups AlbumAlbum   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Digest Number 1139

 
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules Forum Index -> Egroup Archives
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Mark Stone
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 2102
Location: Buckley, WA

PostPosted: Thu Jan 08, 2004 1:33 am    Post subject: Re: Digest Number 1139


Quoting "WarriorRules@yahoogroups.com" <WarriorRules@yahoogroups.com>:

> Message: 4
> Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2004 20:08:36 -0000
> From: "spocksleftball" <spocksleftball@...>
> Subject: Re: French Ordinance List
>
> Point taken Todd, though my plan is to run them in skirmish which
> means the shield is just extra points unused. LMI are shot for a 5 -
> 2 for skirmish, but they don't count as shielded if shooting back.
> The alternative with a sh is to hunker down and still take it on the
> chin at a 3; 12 LI hitting me at a 3 will do much danage, so better
> to shoot back with my 12@1. Perhaps this is flawed reasoning

Yes, it is flawed reasoning, on two counts:
(1) Suppose you take 2 CPF in prep while in skirmish (against any halfway decent
opponent you will). Now you are presumably going to recall, rather than take a
waver test with Ds. OK, so what do you do next bound? Next bound you won't be in
skirmish unless you counter. And your odds of making a counter... hmm, you're
still Ds.
(2) I don't think you'll do a lot of skirmishing with the close order LB. These
are just guys waiting to die. They are the absolute Achilles Heal of this list,
which otherwise would have some real potential. I've emailed before about how I
think these guys should be classified, but I wouldn't expect a change, or at
least not any time soon. As it stands, these guys doom the list.

If you insist on playing this list, put the crossbowmen in 2 24-man units
instead of 3 16-man units (see my previous post about the value of 6-stand
units), and buy shields for the front rank.

If you want a list that is Late Medieval, works on 1200 points, has much the
same feel as French Ordinnance, and isn't handicapped with required troops that
will lose the battle for you, then try Free Company.


-Mark Stone

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message   MSN Messenger
Kelly Wilkinson
Dictator
Dictator


Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 4172
Location: Raytown, MO

PostPosted: Thu Jan 08, 2004 2:40 am    Post subject: Re: Digest Number 1139


Or Scotts Common for that matter. Buttloads of Yeomen Crazy Highlanders and
allied Irg "A" French SHK can really spoil a Wargamer. Too bad Jamie Fish
doesn't play Warrior anymore, he would be drooling about now to play this list!

kelly

Mark Stone <mark@...> wrote:
Quoting "WarriorRules@yahoogroups.com" <WarriorRules@yahoogroups.com>:

> Message: 4
> Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2004 20:08:36 -0000
> From: "spocksleftball" <spocksleftball@...>
> Subject: Re: French Ordinance List
>
> Point taken Todd, though my plan is to run them in skirmish which
> means the shield is just extra points unused. LMI are shot for a 5 -
> 2 for skirmish, but they don't count as shielded if shooting back.
> The alternative with a sh is to hunker down and still take it on the
> chin at a 3; 12 LI hitting me at a 3 will do much danage, so better
> to shoot back with my 12@1. Perhaps this is flawed reasoning

Yes, it is flawed reasoning, on two counts:
(1) Suppose you take 2 CPF in prep while in skirmish (against any halfway decent
opponent you will). Now you are presumably going to recall, rather than take a
waver test with Ds. OK, so what do you do next bound? Next bound you won't be in
skirmish unless you counter. And your odds of making a counter... hmm, you're
still Ds.
(2) I don't think you'll do a lot of skirmishing with the close order LB. These
are just guys waiting to die. They are the absolute Achilles Heal of this list,
which otherwise would have some real potential. I've emailed before about how I
think these guys should be classified, but I wouldn't expect a change, or at
least not any time soon. As it stands, these guys doom the list.

If you insist on playing this list, put the crossbowmen in 2 24-man units
instead of 3 16-man units (see my previous post about the value of 6-stand
units), and buy shields for the front rank.

If you want a list that is Late Medieval, works on 1200 points, has much the
same feel as French Ordinnance, and isn't handicapped with required troops that
will lose the battle for you, then try Free Company.


-Mark Stone

Yahoo! Groups SponsorADVERTISEMENT


---------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/WarriorRules/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
WarriorRules-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


_________________
Roll down and Win!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  
Display posts from previous:   
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules Forum Index -> Egroup Archives All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group