Warrior Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules
A Four Horsemen Enterprises Rules Set
 
  FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups AlbumAlbum   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

July 10 Draft

 
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules Forum Index -> Egroup Archives
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
joncleaves
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 29 Mar 2006
Posts: 16447

PostPosted: Tue Jul 11, 2000 6:59 am    Post subject: July 10 Draft


I have just posted the July 10 draft of the Warrior rules (MS Word 97 and
Text versions) to the egroup files area. Hey, I'm sure it is still July 10th
somwhere.

Despite my best efforts, and all my free waking minutes since March, it is
not a complete draft. All I can tell you is that you sent me HUNDREDS of
pages of stuff, and I read every word. Took longer than I expected. I am,
however, very pleased with the results to date. I cannot wait to be playing
THIS game.

The key rules (1.0 to 11.0 are 'done'), but it is important that you know
what is NOT finished:

--Most of the examples are not done. That is because they will be finished
when we write the COMPLETE EXAMPLE BATTLE, which will require an entire
weekend.
--1.1, 6.8, 13.0, 15.0, 16.0 and 17.0 are not complete.
--12.0 and 14.0 are still there, but I have not incorporated everything you
guys sent me yet.
--The play aids are not included in this draft.

What we need most from you folks is stuff like the following:
1. Check to make sure that a rules reference is to the correct rule. Also
make sure all the x.xx's are gone.
2. Make sure that when the rules use a particular term (body, unit, known,
very rough area, etc.) that is exactly what they are supposed to be saying.

I am off on my pilgrimage to Origins, Historicon and Gencon. I will have a
laptop/email ability over the next month, but will not be killing myself on
Warrior again until August. I WILL be available to talk (and play!) Warrior
at Hcon.
No need to rush to get anything to me until August 15th.

Take a moment when you can to ensure the egroup members list has your correct
name (not just email address) so I can give proper credit when the time comes.

On behalf of the Four Horsemen, thanks for your help.
Jon


_________________
Roll Up and Win!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  
joncleaves
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 29 Mar 2006
Posts: 16447

PostPosted: Tue Jul 11, 2000 1:22 pm    Post subject: Re: July 10 Draft


Don
When you charge, you may shoot with a rear rank of bow-armed lancers.

In subsequent bounds, you may not shoot with a rank eligible to fight (8.93),
so if the L are pursuing, they cannot shoot. If the L are not pursuing, they
can shoot.

Off to Columbus!!
Jon


_________________
Roll Up and Win!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  
Don Coon
Imperator
Imperator


Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 2742

PostPosted: Tue Jul 11, 2000 2:13 pm    Post subject: Re: July 10 Draft


Patrick pointed out that per 8.8 chargers can shoot in support with bow
from a rear rank. This has always been true and appears as no change.
However now that lances fight 2 ranks deeps, did you intend for the
second rank of L armed cav also armed with bow to shoot in support? We
have not been allowing this, but Patrick has a solid rule defended
point. I think the 2 ranks of lances is to compensate for the loss of
wedging. Troops on the leading edge of a wedge never could shoot in
support, but now they effectively can as the 2 extra figures from the
old wedge now come from the 2nd rank.

Example Body 1 6 EHK with L (Fuedal English). Body 2 6 EHC with L and B
(Yuan Mongol).

In WRG Body 1 would wedge and hit with 5 figures. Body 2 would hit with
3 figures and support shoot with 2.

In Warrior body 1 hits with 5 figures (3 front rank + 1/2 second rank).
Body 2 hits with 5 figures (same rationale) + support shoots with 2.

This does not seem right. The mongols (a non wedging army in the first
place) now get the "wedge bonus" and can still shoot with bow? Are we
missing something or was this the intent?

Don

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  
Jevon Garrett
Recruit
Recruit


Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 53

PostPosted: Tue Jul 11, 2000 6:26 pm    Post subject: Re: July 10 Draft


Wait a minute. Scott H told me at Historicon last year that bow-
armed lancers could not shoot from a rear rank when charging. Is
this just a clarification under Warrior? I'm not complaining, just
want to know what the rules will be at Historicon in the mini and
the NICT.

Jevon

> Don
> When you charge, you may shoot with a rear rank of bow-armed lancers.
>
> In subsequent bounds, you may not shoot with a rank eligible to fight
> (8.93), so if the L are pursuing, they cannot shoot. If the L are not
> pursuing, they can shoot.
>
> Off to Columbus!!
> Jon
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> -- LOW RATE, NO WAIT! Get a NextCard Visa, in 30 seconds! Get rates
> as low as 2.9% Intro or 9.9% Fixed APR and no hidden fees.
> http://click.egroups.com/1/6629/2/_/_/_/963325360/
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> WarriorRules-unsubscribe@egroups.com
>
>
>

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message   AIM Address
scott holder
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Posts: 6066
Location: Bonnots Mill, MO

PostPosted: Tue Jul 11, 2000 7:56 pm    Post subject: Re: July 10 Draft


Wait a minute. Scott H told me at Historicon last year that bow-
armed lancers could not shoot from a rear rank when charging. Is
this just a clarification under Warrior? I'm not complaining, just
want to know what the rules will be at Historicon in the mini and
the NICT.

>You musta been drunk:)Smile Me? Say THAT? Or perhaps I was on something.
It's pretty obvious from the rules that "ranks which have not yet fought in
hth can support shoot with bow" or something to that effect.

Scott


_________________
These Rules Suck, Let's Paint!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message   Visit poster's website
Jevon Garrett
Recruit
Recruit


Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 53

PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2000 7:53 am    Post subject: Re: July 10 Draft


What, me drunk during a game? Perish the thought. I think you
are still getting back at me for moving from Rochester and giving
you a less reliable source for garbage plates. ; ) Maybe I
misunderstood - yeah, that's it, the litigator misunderstood, not that
you were unclear or anything. ; 0

Jevon

>
> Wait a minute. Scott H told me at Historicon last year that bow-
> armed lancers could not shoot from a rear rank when charging. Is this
> just a clarification under Warrior? I'm not complaining, just want to
> know what the rules will be at Historicon in the mini and the NICT.
>
> >You musta been drunk:)Smile Me? Say THAT? Or perhaps I was on
> >something.
> It's pretty obvious from the rules that "ranks which have not yet
> fought in hth can support shoot with bow" or something to that effect.
>
> Scott
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> -- LOW RATE, NO WAIT! Get a NextCard Visa, in 30 seconds! Get rates
> as low as 2.9% Intro or 9.9% Fixed APR and no hidden fees.
> http://click.egroups.com/1/6632/2/_/_/_/963349026/
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> WarriorRules-unsubscribe@egroups.com
>
>
>

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message   AIM Address
scott holder
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Posts: 6066
Location: Bonnots Mill, MO

PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2000 12:07 pm    Post subject: Re: July 10 Draft


What, me drunk during a game? Perish the thought. I think you
are still getting back at me for moving from Rochester and giving
you a less reliable source for garbage plates. ; ) Maybe I
misunderstood - yeah, that's it, the litigator misunderstood, not that
you were unclear or anything. ; 0

>*chuckling maniacally* You'd better hope you don't need any questions
answered at the NICT:)SmileSmile I know, I'll pair you against Derek in the first
round!!!!

Scott


_________________
These Rules Suck, Let's Paint!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message   Visit poster's website
scott holder
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Posts: 6066
Location: Bonnots Mill, MO

PostPosted: Fri Jul 14, 2000 4:10 pm    Post subject: Re: July 10 Draft


I too remember you saying that L,B troops in the second rank cannot
shoot due to the fact that they are eligible to fight. You may have said
something like "you can't have your cake and eat it too." This arguement
would have to carry over to LMI Jls,B,Sh who should then, by your ruling, be
able to fight a rank and a half, plus support shoot with 1/2 rear rank?

>Ugh. I'll endeavor to examine the rules minutely prior to next week.


_________________
These Rules Suck, Let's Paint!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message   Visit poster's website
joncleaves
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 29 Mar 2006
Posts: 16447

PostPosted: Fri Jul 14, 2000 8:09 pm    Post subject: Re: July 10 Draft


Let's all be clear.

Today, in Warrior, a second rank of L,B that just charged can support shoot.

In WRG 7th it does READ that way, but it is up to Scott what actually happens
in WRG 7th NASAMW tourneys.

I have no intention of changing the Warrior rule unless the other Horsemen
'outvote' me.


_________________
Roll Up and Win!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  
Ewan McNay
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 2778
Location: Albany, NY, US

PostPosted: Fri Jul 14, 2000 8:43 pm    Post subject: Re: July 10 Draft


He may well have said this Smile but he would be wrong... note that I make no
comment on the likelihood of this latter ;)

On 14 Jul 2000, Holder, Scott <FHWA> wrote:

>
> I too remember you saying that L,B troops in the second rank cannot
> shoot due to the fact that they are eligible to fight. You may have said
> something like "you can't have your cake and eat it too." This arguement
> would have to carry over to LMI Jls,B,Sh who should then, by your ruling, be
> able to fight a rank and a half, plus support shoot with 1/2 rear rank?
>
> >Ugh. I'll endeavor to examine the rules minutely prior to next week.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Get great brand name shoes with just the click of a mouse. Check out
> the huge selection at Zappos.com, the Web's Most Popular Store!
> http://click.egroups.com/1/6994/2/_/_/_/963594770/
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> WarriorRules-unsubscribe@egroups.com
>
>
>

--
Dr. Ewan McNay - Behavioral Neuroscience, Yale University.
(203) 432-7005

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  
Todd Kaeser
Centurion
Centurion


Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 1218
Location: Foxborough, Massachusetts

PostPosted: Fri Jul 14, 2000 9:07 pm    Post subject: Re: July 10 Draft


Scott,
I too remember you saying that L,B troops in the second rank cannot
shoot due to the fact that they are eligible to fight. You may have said
something like "you can't have your cake and eat it too." This arguement
would have to carry over to LMI Jls,B,Sh who should then, by your ruling, be
able to fight a rank and a half, plus support shoot with 1/2 rear rank?

Todd
----------
From: "Holder, Scott <FHWA>" <Scott.Holder@...>
To: jgarrett@... (IPM Return requested) (Receipt
notification requested),WarriorRules@egroups.com (IPM Return requested)
(Receipt notification requested)
Subject: Re: [WarriorRules] July 10 Draft
Date: Tue, Jul 11, 2000, 11:56 AM



Wait a minute. Scott H told me at Historicon last year that bow-
armed lancers could not shoot from a rear rank when charging. Is
this just a clarification under Warrior? I'm not complaining, just
want to know what the rules will be at Historicon in the mini and
the NICT.

>You musta been drunk:)Smile Me? Say THAT? Or perhaps I was on something.
It's pretty obvious from the rules that "ranks which have not yet fought in
hth can support shoot with bow" or something to that effect.

Scott
























------------------------------------------------------------------------
LOW RATE, NO WAIT!
Get a NextCard Visa, in 30 seconds! Get rates
as low as 2.9% Intro or 9.9% Fixed APR and no hidden fees.
http://click.egroups.com/1/6632/2/_/_/_/963349026/
------------------------------------------------------------------------

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
WarriorRules-unsubscribe@egroups.com


_________________
Nolite te Bastardes Carborundorum
"Don't let the Bastards Grind You Down"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message [ Hidden ]
scott holder
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Posts: 6066
Location: Bonnots Mill, MO

PostPosted: Sat Jul 15, 2000 2:09 am    Post subject: Re: July 10 Draft


I was apparently on drugs when making that ruling.

>>> JonCleaves@... 7/14/00 4:07:00 PM >>>
Let's all be clear.

Today, in Warrior, a second rank of L,B that just charged can support shoot.

In WRG 7th it does READ that way, but it is up to Scott what actually happens
in WRG 7th NASAMW tourneys.

I have no intention of changing the Warrior rule unless the other Horsemen
'outvote' me.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get great brand name shoes with just the click of a mouse. Check out
the huge selection at Zappos.com, the Web's Most Popular Store!
http://click.egroups.com/1/6994/2/_/_/_/963608970/
------------------------------------------------------------------------

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
WarriorRules-unsubscribe@egroups.com


_________________
These Rules Suck, Let's Paint!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message   Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules Forum Index -> Egroup Archives All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group