| View previous topic :: View next topic | 
	
	
		| Author | Message | 
	
		| Legionary
 
  
 
 Joined: 12 Apr 2006
 Posts: 300
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Tue Apr 30, 2002 9:18 pm    Post subject: Successor phalangites |  |  
				| 
 |  
				| Did the successor phalangites wear the linen cuirass like later hoplites?
 
 I have some Old Glory figures that don't appear to be wearing metal
 breastplates. I was figuring on white linen body armor, but I don't know and
 don't have the proper Osprey books yet.
 
 John Meunier
 
 
 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
 
 
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| scott holder Moderator
 
  
  
 Joined: 30 Mar 2006
 Posts: 6079
 Location: Bonnots Mill, MO
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Wed May 01, 2002 2:25 pm    Post subject: Re: Successor phalangites |  |  
				| 
 |  
				| Did the successor phalangites wear the linen cuirass like later
 hoplites?
 
 >Yes
 
 I have some Old Glory figures that don't appear to be wearing metal
 breastplates. I was figuring on white linen body armor, but I don't know
 and
 don't have the proper Osprey books yet.
 
 >Don't know about later Osprey books but earlier ones left something to
 be desired.  Peter Connolly's books on this period remain the best.
 
 Scott
 List Ho
 
 
 _________________
 These Rules Suck, Let's Paint!
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| Recruit
 
  
 
 Joined: 12 Apr 2006
 Posts: 244
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Wed May 01, 2002 3:53 pm    Post subject: RE: Successor phalangites |  |  
				| 
 |  
				| Oh, you like the Peter Connolly books.  What is your stand on the heretical
 "Macedonians" at Zama?  Connolly has some nice paintings of mailed
 phalangites.  I know Phil Barker dismisses them out of hand.  Will you have
 any in the Later Carthaginian lists?  And when will that book be out, O
 Great List Ho?
 
 John Carroll
 
 > -----Original Message-----
 > From: Holder, Scott <FHWA> [mailto:Scott.Holder@...]
 > Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 7:25 AM
 > To: IPM Return requested (Receipt notification requested)
 > Subject: Re: [WarriorRules] Successor phalangites
 >
 >
 > Did the successor phalangites wear the linen cuirass like later
 > hoplites?
 >
 > >Yes
 >
 > I have some Old Glory figures that don't appear to be wearing metal
 > breastplates. I was figuring on white linen body armor, but I don't know
 > and
 > don't have the proper Osprey books yet.
 >
 > >Don't know about later Osprey books but earlier ones left something to
 > be desired.  Peter Connolly's books on this period remain the best.
 >
 > Scott
 > List Ho
 >
 >
 >
 >
 >
 >
 >
 >
 >
 >
 >
 >
 >
 >
 > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 > WarriorRules-unsubscribe@egroups.com
 >
 >
 >
 > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 >
 >
 >
 
 
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| scott holder Moderator
 
  
  
 Joined: 30 Mar 2006
 Posts: 6079
 Location: Bonnots Mill, MO
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Wed May 01, 2002 4:02 pm    Post subject: RE: Successor phalangites |  |  
				| 
 |  
				| Oh, you like the Peter Connolly books.  What is your stand on the
 heretical
 "Macedonians" at Zama?
 
 >I'm generally impressed with Connolly's research.  Of course you point
 out the one doofy thing he says:)
  :) 
 Connolly has some nice paintings of mailed
 phalangites.
 
 >Somewhere in there he has some linen-ed pikemen as well.
 
 I know Phil Barker dismisses them out of hand.  Will you have
 any in the Later Carthaginian lists?  And when will that book be out, O
 Great List Ho?
 
 >Heh heh, unlikely.  Publication schedule can be found at
 www.fourhorsemenenterprises.com.
 
 Scott
 List Ho
 
 
 _________________
 These Rules Suck, Let's Paint!
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| Recruit
 
  
 
 Joined: 12 Apr 2006
 Posts: 98
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Wed May 01, 2002 4:13 pm    Post subject: Re: Successor phalangites |  |  
				| 
 |  
				| --- In WarriorRules@y..., scribblerjohn@a... wrote:
 > Did the successor phalangites wear the linen cuirass like later
 hoplites?
 >
 > I have some Old Glory figures that don't appear to be wearing metal
 > breastplates.
 
 I vaguely remember an article about the Macedonian tomb that has been
 attributed to Philip (Alexanders father) which had some evidence for
 metal armour plates that would have been incorporated into a
 linen/leather corselet. So even if the armour does not look like a
 metal cuirrass it might still be as tough.
 
 Adam
 
 
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| Recruit
 
  
 
 Joined: 12 Apr 2006
 Posts: 244
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Wed May 01, 2002 4:25 pm    Post subject: RE: Successor phalangites |  |  
				| 
 |  
				| Oh, a 2 year wait?
 Wassamatta?  You have a real job or something?
 
 
 > -----Original Message-----
 > From: Holder, Scott <FHWA> [mailto:Scott.Holder@...]
 > Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 9:02 AM
 > To: IPM Return requested (Receipt notification requested)
 > Subject: RE: [WarriorRules] Successor phalangites
 >
 >
 > Oh, you like the Peter Connolly books.  What is your stand on the
 > heretical
 > "Macedonians" at Zama?
 >
 > >I'm generally impressed with Connolly's research.  Of course you point
 > out the one doofy thing he says:)
    >
 > Connolly has some nice paintings of mailed
 > phalangites.
 >
 > >Somewhere in there he has some linen-ed pikemen as well.
 >
 > I know Phil Barker dismisses them out of hand.  Will you have
 > any in the Later Carthaginian lists?  And when will that book be out, O
 > Great List Ho?
 >
 > >Heh heh, unlikely.  Publication schedule can be found at
 > www.fourhorsemenenterprises.com.
 >
 > Scott
 > List Ho
 >
 >
 >
 >
 >
 >
 >
 >
 >
 >
 >
 >
 >
 >
 >
 >
 >
 >
 >
 >
 > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 > WarriorRules-unsubscribe@egroups.com
 >
 >
 >
 > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 >
 >
 >
 
 
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| Recruit
 
  
 
 Joined: 12 Apr 2006
 Posts: 89
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Wed May 01, 2002 7:27 pm    Post subject: Re: Successor phalangites |  |  
				| 
 |  
				| --- In WarriorRules@y..., "John Carroll Compuserve"
 <johncarroll453@c...> wrote:
 > Oh, you like the Peter Connolly books.  What is your stand on the
 heretical
 > "Macedonians" at Zama?  Connolly has some nice paintings of mailed
 > phalangites.  I know Phil Barker dismisses them out of hand.  Will
 you have
 > any in the Later Carthaginian lists?  And when will that book be
 out, O
 > Great List Ho?
 >
 > John Carroll
 >
 
 Agreed! I think both Connoly's books and Osprey books have "pretty
 pictures" but are flawed in many ways.
 
 Anyone remember the so-called Carthaginian "light pike"?
 
 IMHO I would stick with primary sources and would disavow most things
 that couldn't be confirmed at least two or three times
 as "unreliable" or "speculative".
 
 In the end, however, it is a game and choices have to be made
 somewhere along the line :)
 
 Keep up the good work FHE.
 
 -Bill Littlefield
 
 
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		|  |