| View previous topic :: View next topic | 
	
	
		| Author | Message | 
	
		| joncleaves Moderator
 
  
  
 Joined: 29 Mar 2006
 Posts: 16447
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Tue Apr 03, 2001 3:14 am    Post subject: Re: Re: waver test ? |  |  
				| 
 |  
				| The foot body is disordered BY the break through.  Therefore when the waver
 cause occurs, the enemy will be behind its flank.
 
 
 _________________
 Roll Up and Win!
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| joncleaves Moderator
 
  
  
 Joined: 29 Mar 2006
 Posts: 16447
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Tue Apr 03, 2001 3:16 am    Post subject: Re: waver test ? |  |  
				| 
 |  
				| No sweat, I'll look at it.  Not to 11.2 yet, but will clarify.  Being broken
 through is a combat disorder.
 
 
 _________________
 Roll Up and Win!
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| Ed Forbes Centurion
 
  
 
 Joined: 12 Apr 2006
 Posts: 1092
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Tue Apr 03, 2001 4:45 am    Post subject: waver test ? |  |  
				| 
 |  
				| Break through counts as a  disordering interpenetration, causing a waver
 test for the foot if a second cause of disorder .
 
 Question: Does the foot count unbroken enemy body behind flank within 240
 for a  cause of unease on waver?
 
 Is the cav considered to behind the inf formation at the time of the
 test?
 If the test is considered to be taken after the action, the cav would
 almost have to be through the inf unit and into the inf  rear.
 
 Thanks,
 
 Ed F
 
 
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| Legionary
 
  
 
 Joined: 12 Apr 2006
 Posts: 594
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Tue Apr 03, 2001 5:14 am    Post subject: Re: waver test ? |  |  
				| 
 |  
				| In Oz, we ALWAYS count the break through unit as a HUGE cause of
 unease and why not?  The waver test is done after the break through so
 at time of testing, there they are!  Even if the cav unit fails to
 completely clear the inf, they should STILL be considered to be behind
 the flank.  Always happy to be proved wrong.
 
 Cheers
 
 Steve
 
 
 --- In WarriorRules@y..., Ed C Forbes <eforbes100@j...> wrote:
 > Break through counts as a  disordering interpenetration, causing a
 waver
 > test for the foot if a second cause of disorder .
 >
 > Question: Does the foot count unbroken enemy body behind flank
 within 240
 > for a  cause of unease on waver?
 >
 > Is the cav considered to behind the inf formation at the time of the
 > test?
 > If the test is considered to be taken after the action, the cav
 would
 > almost have to be through the inf unit and into the inf  rear.
 >
 > Thanks,
 >
 > Ed F
 
 
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| Don Coon Imperator
 
  
 
 Joined: 12 Apr 2006
 Posts: 2742
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Tue Apr 03, 2001 5:58 am    Post subject: Re: waver test ? |  |  
				| 
 |  
				| > Break through counts as a  disordering interpenetration, causing a waver
 > test for the foot if a second cause of disorder .
 >
 Where do you see that this causes a waver test.  Are you counting burst
 throughs as a "becomes disordered" combat result?
 
 Jon,
 
 This is obviously not a clear rules section.  I feel you need to clarify
 para 11.2 and its relation to 5.141 bullet 3.  If we are not seeing eye to
 eye, imagine a newbie playing your product for the first time.
 
 Don
 
 
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		|  |