View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
joncleaves Moderator


Joined: 29 Mar 2006 Posts: 16447
|
Posted: Tue Apr 03, 2001 3:14 am Post subject: Re: Re: waver test ? |
 |
|
The foot body is disordered BY the break through. Therefore when the waver
cause occurs, the enemy will be behind its flank.
_________________ Roll Up and Win! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
joncleaves Moderator


Joined: 29 Mar 2006 Posts: 16447
|
Posted: Tue Apr 03, 2001 3:16 am Post subject: Re: waver test ? |
 |
|
No sweat, I'll look at it. Not to 11.2 yet, but will clarify. Being broken
through is a combat disorder.
_________________ Roll Up and Win! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ed Forbes Centurion

Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 1092
|
Posted: Tue Apr 03, 2001 4:45 am Post subject: waver test ? |
 |
|
Break through counts as a disordering interpenetration, causing a waver
test for the foot if a second cause of disorder .
Question: Does the foot count unbroken enemy body behind flank within 240
for a cause of unease on waver?
Is the cav considered to behind the inf formation at the time of the
test?
If the test is considered to be taken after the action, the cav would
almost have to be through the inf unit and into the inf rear.
Thanks,
Ed F
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Legionary

Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 594
|
Posted: Tue Apr 03, 2001 5:14 am Post subject: Re: waver test ? |
 |
|
In Oz, we ALWAYS count the break through unit as a HUGE cause of
unease and why not? The waver test is done after the break through so
at time of testing, there they are! Even if the cav unit fails to
completely clear the inf, they should STILL be considered to be behind
the flank. Always happy to be proved wrong.
Cheers
Steve
--- In WarriorRules@y..., Ed C Forbes <eforbes100@j...> wrote:
> Break through counts as a disordering interpenetration, causing a
waver
> test for the foot if a second cause of disorder .
>
> Question: Does the foot count unbroken enemy body behind flank
within 240
> for a cause of unease on waver?
>
> Is the cav considered to behind the inf formation at the time of the
> test?
> If the test is considered to be taken after the action, the cav
would
> almost have to be through the inf unit and into the inf rear.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ed F
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Don Coon Imperator

Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 2742
|
Posted: Tue Apr 03, 2001 5:58 am Post subject: Re: waver test ? |
 |
|
> Break through counts as a disordering interpenetration, causing a waver
> test for the foot if a second cause of disorder .
>
Where do you see that this causes a waver test. Are you counting burst
throughs as a "becomes disordered" combat result?
Jon,
This is obviously not a clear rules section. I feel you need to clarify
para 11.2 and its relation to 5.141 bullet 3. If we are not seeing eye to
eye, imagine a newbie playing your product for the first time.
Don
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|